New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344

08 January 2026

GDP Growth Pegged At 7.4% | SC Disagrees With LS Speaker | Venezuela To Give US 50mn Oil | NATGRID And Digital Control | Sharpen India’s AMR Battle Signal | Letter Against Spirit | The Middle Path | Why Gaza’s Donkey Broke Me | SC Rap On CAQM, A Wake-Up Call | Economy Grows,But Risk Loom | Why Silver Soared 160% in 2025

GDP GROWTH PEGGED AT 7.4%

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation released First Advance Estimates (FAE) of GDP for 2025–26.
  • Real GDP growth estimated at 7.4%, higher than 6.5% in 2024–25.
  • Nominal GDP growth estimated at 8%.
  • FAE is crucial as it forms the base for Union Budget calculations.

Key Data & Facts

  • Real GDP growth (2025–26): 7.4%  
  • Nominal GDP growth: 8%
  • Q1 growth: 7.8%
  • Q2 growth: 8.2%
  • Estimated H2 average growth: 6.8%  RBI projection (Dec 2025): 7.3%
  • Private Final Consumption Expenditure growth: 7%
  • Gross Fixed Capital Formation growth: 7.8%  Mining & quarrying growth: –0.7%
  • Services sector growth: 9.1%

Static Linkages

  • GDP measured using Production, Income and Expenditure approaches
  • Private Final Consumption Expenditure (PFCE) indicates household demand
  • Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) reflects investment activity
  • Services sector is the largest contributor to India’s GDP
  • Advance Estimates are part of National Income Accounting

Critical Analysis

  • Strengths
    • Robust services sector cushions global slowdown
    • Rising capital formation indicates investment revival
    • Growth maintained despite external trade shocks
  • Concerns
    • Consumption growth remains modest  
    • Mining sector contraction affects core industries
    • Overdependence on services may limit job creation
    • Export-oriented labour-intensive sectors under stress

Way Forward

  • Boost domestic demand through income and employment support
  • Accelerate manufacturing and mining reforms  Diversify export markets to reduce tariff vulnerability
  • Encourage private investment through policy stability
  • Focus on balanced sectoral growth

SC DISAGREES WITH LS SPEAKER

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Allegations emerged in March 2025 regarding half-burnt currency found at the official residence of a sitting High Court judge in Delhi.
  • Removal motions were submitted in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on July 21, 2025.
  • The Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman rejected the motion due to procedural reasons amid vacancy of the Chairman’s office.
  • On August 12, 2025, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla constituted a three-member inquiry committee under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968.
  • The judge challenged the committee, arguing that it must be jointly constituted by the Speaker and Chairman of Rajya Sabha.
  • The Supreme Court of India prima facie disagreed, stating there is no statutory bar on the Speaker acting if one House rejects the motion.

Key Points

  •  Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 operationalises Articles 124(4) and 217(1)(b) of the Constitution.
  • Section 3(2): After admission of a motion, a three- member committee is formed:
    • A Supreme Court judge
    • A High Court Chief Justice  An eminent jurist
  • First Proviso to Section 3(2):
    • Applies only when motions are admitted in both Houses on the same day.
    • Committee must then be constituted jointly by Speaker and Chairman.
  • In the present case:
    • Rajya Sabha motion was not admitted.
    • Hence, joint constitution requirement not triggered.
  • Deputy Chairman can exercise Chairman’s functions during vacancy under Rules of Procedure of Rajya Sabha.

Static Linkages

  • Removal of judges is a quasi-judicial parliamentary process, not purely political.
  • Presiding Officers act as statutory authorities, not merely House regulators.
  • Doctrine of constitutional silence: where law is silent, interpretation must further constitutional objectives.
  • Balance between judicial independence and institutional accountability.

Critical Analysis

  • Strengths
    • Prevents procedural paralysis in cases of serious judicial misconduct.
    • Upholds legislative responsibility in ensuring judicial accountability.
    • Supreme Court’s view promotes functional interpretation of statutes.
  • Concerns
    • Ambiguity in law regarding inter-House coordination.
    • Possibility of perceived executive/legislative overreach.
    • Risk of politicisation of impeachment mechanisms. Constitutional Dimension
    • Independence of judiciary is not immunity from scrutiny.
    • Accountability mechanisms must operate without undermining judicial autonomy.

Way Forward

  • Codify procedures for scenarios involving vacancy or rejection by one House.
  • Issue parliamentary guidelines clarifying Presiding Officers’ statutory roles.
  • Strengthen internal checks to prevent misuse of impeachment provisions.
  • Ensure time-bound inquiry to maintain public confidence in institutions.

VENEZUELA TO GIVE US 50 MN OIL 

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News 
  • Donald Trump claimed Venezuela’s interim authorities would transfer 30–50 million barrels of oil to the United States after U.S. military action.
  • Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro taken into U.S. custody on charges of narco- terrorism.
  • Delcy Rodríguez appointed interim leader; denies foreign governance.

Key Exam Facts

  • Venezuela has the world’s largest proven oil reserves.
  • Current oil production: < 1 million barrels/day.   
  • 50 million barrels ≈ $3 billion (at ~$60/barrel).
  • At present output, >2 months needed to produce 50 million barrels.
  • U.S. imposed economic sanctions + naval quarantine on Venezuelan oil.

Core Concepts to Remember

  • State sovereignty & non-intervention are fundamental principles of international law.
  • Control over natural resources lies with the sovereign state.
  • Sanctions are tools of coercive diplomacy but remain legally contested when unilateral.
  • Military intervention for resource access raises ethical and legal concerns.

Why Important for exam

  • Illustrates power politics vs rule-based international order.
  • Shows energy security as a driver of foreign policy.
  • Highlights challenges to UN Charter principles.
  • Relevant example of regime change & interim governments in IR.

Prelims Takeaway

  • Largest oil reserves country → Venezuela   
  • Oil diplomacy + sanctions + intervention = contemporary geopolitics trend
  • Sovereignty over resources is internationally recognised, external control is disputed
NATGRID AND DIGITAL CONTROL
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • National Intelligence Grid (NATGRID) has gained operational traction in 2025.
  • Reports indicate:
    • ~45,000 queries per month.
    • Access expanded from Central agencies to State police (up to SP rank).
    • Integration with National Population Register (NPR) covering ~119 crore residents.
  •  Originally conceptualised after the 2008 Mumbai attacks (26/11) to address intelligence coordination failures.

Key Points

  • NATGRID is a secure middleware platform (not a database).
  • Enables authorised agencies to query data from 21 categories, including:
    • Identity, immigration, banking, telecom, travel records.
  • Approved in 2012 by Cabinet Committee on Security (executive order).
  • Lacks:
    • Dedicated Parliamentary law
    • Independent statutory oversight authority  
  • Recent upgrades include:
    • Advanced analytics and entity resolution tools
    • Potential use of facial recognition + KYC datasets

Static Linkages

  • Right to Privacy under Article 21 recognised in
  • Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India  Surveillance must satisfy:
    • Legality
    • Necessity
    • Proportionality
    • Procedural safeguards
  • Police → State List, but intelligence & national security → Union domain
  • 2nd ARC: Intelligence reforms must balance efficiency with accountability

Critical Analysis

  • Pros
    • Improves inter-agency intelligence sharing
    • Helps in counter-terrorism, organised crime, economic offences
    • Reduces data silos → faster investigations
  • Concerns
    • No statutory backing → weak constitutional legitimacy
    • Integration with NPR risks mass surveillance
    • Algorithmic bias may reinforce social profiling
    • Expansion to routine policing → mission creep
    • Logging without independent audit → weak safeguard
    • Judicial and parliamentary oversight largely absent

Way Forward

  • Enact a NATGRID-specific legislation  Define:
    • Purpose limitation  
    • Access thresholds
    • Data retention norms
  • Create Parliamentary Intelligence Oversight Committee
  • Mandatory judicial authorisation for sensitive queries
  • Independent audits (CAG / Data Protection Authority)
  • Strengthen human intelligence & police training, not only tech reliance 

SHARPEN INDIA’S AMR BATTLE SIGNAL

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • In the 129th Mann Ki Baat (Dec 28, 2025), Narendra Modi flagged antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a serious public health concern
  • Cited Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) data showing declining effectiveness of antibiotics for pneumonia and UTIs.
  • Advised citizens to avoid self-medication and indiscriminate antibiotic use.
  • Significance: Brings AMR into public discourse, beyond experts and policy circles.

Key Points

  • AMR: Ability of microbes to resist antimicrobial drugs.
  • Major cause in India: Misuse and overuse of antibiotics (OTC sales, self-medication).
  • India’s surveillance:
    • NARS-Net (2013): ~60 sentinel government medical college labs.
    • Reports data to Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (WHO-GLASS).
    • Coverage skewed towards urban tertiary centres.
  • Gap: Limited data from rural, primary/secondary care and private hospitals.
  • Approach needed: One Health (human– animal–environment interface).

Static Linkages

  • Drug resistance due to natural selection.  
  • Antibiotic misuse as negative externality.  
  • Public health as state responsibility.
  • Surveillance systems in disease control.
  • Human–animal–environment health interlinkage.

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • High-level political messaging → mass awareness.
    • Behavioural focus complements policy measures.
    • Aligns with WHO Global Action Plan on AMR.
  • Concerns
    • Awareness alone insufficient without regulation.
    • Weak enforcement of prescription-only antibiotics.
    • Inadequate and non-representative surveillance.
    • Limited One Health integration.

Way Forward

  • Expand AMR surveillance to district, primary and private facilities.
  • Strict enforcement of prescription-only antibiotic sales.
  • Institutionalise One Health coordination.
  • Strengthen infection prevention and antibiotic stewardship.
  • Invest in labs, diagnostics, and AMR research.
LETTER AGAINST SPIRIT

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • The Election Commission of India (ECI) informed the Supreme Court of India on January 6 that it has a constitutional obligation to ensure that only Indian citizens are included in electoral rolls.
  • The submission came in defence of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, during which millions of names have been deleted.
  • Opposition parties, legal scholars, and civil society groups have raised concerns over burden of proof, harassment, and exclusion of genuine citizens.
  • The debate centres on whether the ECI’s current approach aligns with the letter and spirit of its constitutional mandate.

Key Points

  • Article 324 grants the ECI superintendence, direction, and control over preparation of electoral rolls.
  • The ECI argued that even a single foreign national cannot be allowed on voter lists.
  • Critics highlight that no stakeholder has defended inclusion of foreigners, but question the process and proportionality of SIR.
  • Large-scale deletions raise fears of disenfranchisement, especially of the poor, migrants, minorities, and urban informal workers.
  • Trust in electoral processes depends on whether losing sides accept outcomes as fair, a key democratic principle.

Static Linkages

  • Universal adult franchise as a basic feature of Indian democracy.
  • Right to vote as a statutory right under the Representation of the People Act, 1950 & 1951.
  • Principle of procedural fairness and natural justice in administrative action.
  • Independence of constitutional bodies as essential to free and fair elections.
  • Doctrine that exclusion error is more harmful than inclusion error in democratic processes.

Critical Analysis

  • Concerns / Challenges
    • Excessive focus on exclusion rather than enrolment of all eligible citizens.
    • Burden of proving citizenship placed on ordinary citizens.
    • Risk of partisan or selective application of rules.
    • Potential erosion of institutional credibility of the ECI.
    • Administrative inconvenience translating into democratic harm.
  • Justifications / Supportive Arguments
    • Clean electoral rolls are essential for electoral integrity.
    • Article 324 provides wide discretionary powers to the ECI.
    • Preventing illegal voting is a legitimate state interest.

Way Forward

  • Reorient electoral revision towards maximum inclusion with safeguards.
  • Use state databases proactively instead of citizen-led proof submission.
  • Ensure transparency, notice, hearing, and appeal mechanisms.
  • Parliamentary oversight and judicial review for large-scale revisions.
  • Reinforce ECI’s role as enabler of franchise, not merely gatekeeper.

THE MIDDLE PATH

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context

  • Tamil Nadu government announced Tamil Nadu Assured Pension Scheme (TAPS) ahead of Assembly elections.
  • Aimed at balancing electoral promise of OPS restoration with fiscal prudence.
  • Applies mainly to employees recruited after April 2003 under CPS.

Key Features

  • Assured pension: 50% of last drawn pay.
  • Employee contribution continues (unlike OPS).
  • Minimum assured pension irrespective of years of service.
  • Death-cum-retirement gratuity included (OPS feature).
  • Hybrid of OPS + UPS (Central Govt.) models.

Fiscal & Economic Facts

  • State debt: ~26.1% of GSDP (declining, but above pre-COVID ~21.5%).
  • Dual burden till 2033:
    • OPS retirees’ pensions.
    • Government contribution for TAPS employees.
  • State’s Own Tax Revenue (SOTR):
    • Growth (Apr–Sept): 3.94% vs projected 22.6%.
    • GST restructuring impact on State finances uncertain.

Static Linkages

  • Shift from Defined Benefit (OPS) to Defined Contribution (CPS) post-2000s.
  • Pension = committed expenditure affecting fiscal deficit.
  • FRBM framework → debt sustainability.
  • Pay Commission revisions cause pension reset under OPS.
  • Concept of intergenerational equity in public finance.

Issues / Critical Analysis

  • Advantages
    • Ensures income security for post-2003 employees.
    • Avoids fiscally risky full OPS restoration.  Predictable pension liability.
  • Concerns
    • Continued fiscal stress due to dual pension systems.
    • Slow revenue growth limits fiscal space.
    • Election-timed announcement → risk of populism.
    • Long-term sustainability depends on revenue performance.

Way Forward

  • Regular actuarial assessment of pension liabilities.
  • Improve tax buoyancy and GST efficiency.
  • Strict adherence to FRBM targets.
  • Transparent reporting of pension obligations.
  • Political consensus against fiscally unsustainable OPS.

WHY GAZA’S DONKEY BROKE ME

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context/ Background
  • Ongoing armed conflict in Gaza has caused:
    • Large-scale civilian displacement
    • Destruction of infrastructure (transport, fuel, health services)
  • Civilians are forced to use animal-drawn carts due to:
    • Fuel shortages
    • Collapse of modern logistics
  • The situation reflects the humanitarian impact of modern warfare.

Why This Matters for exam

  • Illustrates failure of global governance in conflict zones.
  • Highlights limits of technological warfare in ensuring human security.
  • Raises ethical and legal questions under International Humanitarian Law (IHL).

Core Analytical Points

  • Armed conflicts increasingly impact non- combatants, violating IHL principles.
  • Civilian displacement shows:
    • Breakdown of state capacity
    • Weak enforcement of humanitarian norms
  • Dependence on animals indicates:
    • Regression due to infrastructural collapse  
    • Vulnerability of marginalized populations
  • Human security is compromised despite advanced military technology.

Ethical Dimensions

  • Moral responsibility of states to protect civilians.
  • Ethics of care towards vulnerable groups during conflict.
  • Question of means vs ends in security policy.
  • Silence of global institutions raises issues of moral apathy.

Static Linkages

  • Geneva Conventions (1949) – protection of civilians and non-combatants.
  • Human Security (UNDP, 1994) – freedom from fear and want.
  • Just War Theory – proportionality and discrimination.
  • UN Charter – maintenance of international peace and security.

Value Addition Lines

  • “Modern warfare has eroded the distinction between combatants and civilians.”
  • “Human security must complement state- centric notions of national security.”
  • “Technological superiority does not translate into moral legitimacy.”

Way Forward

  • Strengthen enforcement of International Humanitarian Law.
  • Ensure humanitarian corridors in conflict zones.
  • Reform global institutions to prevent selective intervention.
  • Prioritise civilian protection over strategic dominance.

One-Line Prelims Takeaway

  • Human Security concept was introduced by UNDP (1994)
SC RAP ON CAQM, A WAKE-UP CALL
KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Delhi continues to experience persistently poor air quality throughout the year, not limited to winter months.
  • The Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) was established in 2020 to ensure coordinated air pollution control in Delhi–NCR.
  • Despite its mandate, air quality outcomes have not improved significantly.
  • The Supreme Court of India criticised CAQM for:
  • Failure to identify definite pollution sources.
  • Absence of long-term, scientific solutions.
  • The Court directed CAQM to quantify emissions source-wise and plan sustainable interventions.

Key Points

  • Delhi’s air pollution is a structural and year- round problem, with fluctuating intensity.
  • Major pollution sources:
    • Vehicular emissions  
    • Industrial activity
    • Construction dust and unpaved roads  
    • Biomass and stubble burning
  • CAQM’s approach has been largely reactive, relying on bans and restrictions.
  • Implementation depends on multiple agencies, causing:
    • Weak enforcement
    • Diffused accountability
  • Lack of real-time, granular emissions data limits targeted policymaking.
  • Poor coordination among traffic police, municipal bodies, pollution boards, and states.

Static Linkages

  • Clean environment as part of Right to Life (Article 21).
  • Article 48A: State’s duty to protect environment.
  • Article 51A(g): Citizens’ duty to safeguard environment.
  • Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981: Legal framework for air quality regulation.
  • NCERT: Air pollution as a major anthropogenic environmental problem affecting health and productivity.
  • Economic Survey: Air pollution linked to loss of labour productivity and rising health costs.

Critical Analysis

  • Issues Identified
    • Over-dependence on short-term emergency measures.
    • Weak institutional authority of CAQM.
    • Lack of source apportionment-based regulation.  
    • Poor inter-state and inter-agency coordination.
    • Inadequate monitoring and compliance mechanisms.
  • Implications
    • Continued public health risks.
    • Loss of public trust in regulatory institutions.
    • Judicial intervention replacing executive action.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen CAQM with clear enforcement powers.
  • Institutionalise continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS).
  • Regular, season-wise source apportionment studies.
  • Fixed accountability framework for implementing agencies.
  • Shift from bans to structural reforms in:  Transport
  • Urban planning  Energy use
  • Promote airshed-based and data-driven governance.
  •  
ECONOMY GROWS, BUT RISK LOOM

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • National Statistics Office released First Advance Estimates of GDP (2025–26).
  • Real GDP growth estimated at ~7%, higher than initial expectations.
  • Growth expected to moderate in second half of the year.
  • Concerns over low nominal GDP growth and fiscal implications.
  • Upcoming revision of GDP, CPI, and IIP series.

Key Points

  • Growth Trend
    • H1 growth: ~8%
    • H2 growth: ~6.8%
    • Sector-wise Performance
    • Services sector: 9.1% growth (trade, transport, finance, real estate, public administration).
    • Manufacturing: moderate improvement.  Construction & utilities: slower growth.
  • Demand Side
    • Consumption and investment growing at healthy pace.
  • Nominal GDP
    • Estimated at ~8%
    • Lower than Union Budget assumption (10.1%)
    • Second consecutive year below 10%.
  • Risks
    • Slower government expenditure.
    • Impact of US tariff measures under Donald Trump on exports.
  • Statistical Updates
    • New GDP series with 2022–23 base year.  
    • New CPI (base year 2024).
    • Revised Index of Industrial Production.

Static Linkages

  • Real GDP vs Nominal GDP  GDP deflator
  • Debt–GDP ratio and fiscal deficit
  • Base year revision in national accounts  Services-led growth model
  • Inflation measurement using CPI

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Strong services sector supports overall growth.
    • Stable domestic demand.
    • Manufacturing recovery signals structural improvement.
  • Concerns
    • Low nominal GDP affects:  Fiscal deficit targets
    • Debt sustainability
    • Services-led growth may be less employment- intensive.
    • External trade vulnerability persists.  
    • Estimates based on limited data (till November).

Way Forward

  • Boost capital expenditure.
  • Strengthen manufacturing and exports.  Diversify trade partners.
  • Ensure transparency in revised data series.
  • Align fiscal targets with realistic nominal growth.

WHY SILVER SOARED 160% IN 2025

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Silver prices rose over 160% in 2025 and over 7% in early 2026.
  • Gold also hit record highs in 2025 amid global trade tensions and loose monetary policy in the US.
  • Silver outperformed due to combined investment demand and industrial demand.
  • Supply-side disruptions intensified after:
  • US included silver in its Critical Minerals List (Nov 2025).
  • China imposed new rare metals export restrictions (from Jan 1, 2026).

Key Points

  • Nature of demand
    • Unlike gold (store of value), silver has strong industrial use.
    • Key sectors: solar panels, batteries, electronics, AI infrastructure, smart grids.
  • AI linkage
    • Expansion of AI data centres and smart infrastructure increased silver demand.
  • Supply constraints
    • Silver is largely a by-product of lead, zinc, and copper mining.
    • Limited ability to quickly expand supply.
  • Stockpiling
    • US silver inventories rose to 531 million ounces (Sept 2025) due to tariff fears.
  • Market imbalance
    • Shortage of physical silver in London bullion market (Oct 2025) pushed global prices up.
  • India-specific trend
    • Silver ETF inflows peaked at ₹5,342 crore (Sept 2025).
    • Gold + Silver ETFs formed 71.9% of passive fund inflows.
  • Self-reinforcing cycle
    • Rising prices → ETF inflows → physical buying → further supply shortage → higher prices.
  • Other metals
    • Copper crossed $12,000/tonne (Dec 2025) due to similar supply and tariff concerns.

Static Linkages

  • Precious metals as hedge against inflation and currency depreciation
  • Demand–supply mismatch in commodities with inelastic supply
  • Role of ETFs in price discovery
  • Concept of critical minerals and strategic resource security
  • Debasement trade during expansionary monetary policy

Critical Analysis

  • Advantages
    • Supports renewable energy and AI-led growth.
    • Acts as portfolio diversification during volatility.
    • Encourages strategic mineral planning.
  • Concerns
    • Excessive financialisation increases price volatility.
    • High prices affect renewable energy costs.
    • Import dependence worsens current account pressures.
    • Speculation-driven demand may distort real economy needs.

Way Forward

  • Diversify import sources of critical minerals.
  • Promote urban mining and recycling of silver.
  • Strengthen regulation of commodity ETFs.  
  • Build strategic reserves of critical minerals.
  • Improve investor awareness on commodity risks.