New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344

27 October 2025

India-ASEAN Ties Making Progress | Contours of Constitutional Morality | India-Nepal Economic Ties Reset | Foreign Banks Eye India’s Growth | Crude Power Play | Trust Versus Fake Reality | A Vague Unlawful Zone

INDIA-ASEAN TIES MAKING  PROGRESS

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • PM Modi addressed the 22nd ASEAN–India Summit (Kuala Lumpur, 2025) virtually.
  • India announced 2026 as “ASEAN–India Year of Maritime Cooperation.”
  • Summit focused on finalising the ASEAN–India Trade in Goods Agreement (AITIGA) review and adopting the Plan of Action 2026–2030.
  • India reaffirmed partnership in maritime security, digital inclusion, food security, and supply chain resilience.

Key Points

  • Strategic Focus: Strengthen maritime, trade, education, and technology cooperation.
  • Trade Pact: Review of AITIGA (2010) to boost economic potential.
  • Plan 2026–2030: Cooperation in green energy, cybersecurity, health, and innovation.
  • Global South: India, ASEAN as partners for inclusive development.
  • HADR Cooperation: India’s active role in disaster relief in Southeast Asia.
  • High-Level Engagements: Visits by leaders of Indonesia, Singapore, and the Philippines underline ASEAN’s strategic importance.

Static Linkages

  • ASEAN founded (1967) – Bangkok Declaration; HQ – Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • India–ASEAN ties: Dialogue Partner (1992), Summit Level (2002), CSP (2022).
  • Policies: Look East (1992) → Act East (2014); aligns with SAGAR and IPOI.
  • Trade: ASEAN – India’s 4th largest trading partner (~$131 bn in 2023–24).

Critical Analysis

  • Pros
    • Strengthens India’s Indo-Pacific role and economic diversification.
    • Boosts maritime security and blue economy initiatives.
    • Reinforces India’s Global South leadership.
  • Challenges
    • Trade imbalance; implementation delays in AITIGA, connectivity projects.
    • South China Sea tensions may restrict maritime cooperation.
    • Need for better digital and logistics integration.

Way Forward

  • Fast-track AITIGA review.
  • Accelerate IMT Highway and Kaladan projects.
  • Deepen blue economy and marine research.
  • Institutionalise regional HADR cooperation.   Expand Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) to ASEAN.

COUNTOURS OF CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Renewed judicial focus on “Constitutional Morality” in India through key judgments (Sabarimala, Puttaswamy, Manoj Narula, NCT of Delhi).
  • The debate stems from the broader relationship between law and morality — whether law should enforce moral values or merely reflect them.
  • Origin traced to George Grote (1846) and popularized in India by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly debates.

Key Points

  • Meaning: Acting in accordance with the values of the Constitution — justice, equality, liberty, fraternity, and rule of law.
  • Ambedkar’s View: Democracy in India must rest on constitutional morality, not political convenience.
  • Judicial Use:
    • Manoj Narula (2014): Norms of constitutional conduct.
    • Sabarimala (2018): Public morality ≠ constitutional morality.
    • Puttaswamy (2017): Protects individual dignity and privacy.
    • NCT of Delhi (2018): Promotes cooperative federalism.
  • Current Relevance: Debates on faith vs rights, gender equality, criminalization of politics, and Centre-State relations.

Static Linkages

  • Dharma in ancient texts integrated law and morality.
  • A.V. Dicey: Differentiated constitutional law and constitutional conventions.
  • Preamble, DPSPs, and Fundamental Duties embed moral principles.
  • Rule of Law: Foundation of constitutional morality.

Critical Analysis

  • Pros:
    • Ensures rule of law and ethical governance  Protects minority rights
    • Strengthens democracy beyond majoritarianism
  • Cons:
    • Risk of judicial overreach  No clear legal definition
    • Possible conflict with public morality

Way Forward

  • Promote constitutional values via education and civil services training
  • Strengthen ethical standards in public office  Ensure judicial restraint and balance
  • Encourage public discourse on constitutional ethics.

INDIA-NEPAL ECONOMIC TIES RESET

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • On October 1, 2025, RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra announced three major steps towards internationalising the Indian rupee (INR), with direct implications for India–Nepal economic ties.
  • These measures aim to promote cross-border rupee trade, reduce dollar dependency, and strengthen regional financial integration, especially with Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka.
  • The move aligns with India’s broader objective of making INR a global trade settlement currency and promoting financial diplomacy in South Asia.

Key Points

  1. Cross-border INR lending:
  • RBI allows Authorised Dealer (AD) banks to lend INR to non-residents from Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka for trade and investment purposes.
  • Expansion of Special Rupee Vostro Accounts (SRVAs):
    • Foreign banks can now use SRVAs with Indian banks to invest in corporate bonds and commercial papers, besides central government securities.
  • 3.Transparent Reference Rate Mechanism:
    • A reference rate for major partner currencies will be established to facilitate INR-based pricing and transactions.
  • Peg Stability:
    • The INR–NPR peg (₹1 = ₹1.6 NPR) has ensured exchange rate stability for Nepal, supporting trade predictability.
  • Trade Data:
    • India accounts for 65% of Nepal’s international trade and 67% of its exports.
    • Indian FDI in Nepal: $670 million (33% of total FDI stock).

Static Linkages

  • Balance of Payments (BoP) – Components: Current & Capital Account.
  • Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999 – Governs cross-border transactions and AD bank operations. Vostro/Nostro Accounts Concept – Mechanism for international settlements.
  • Rupee Trade Mechanism (2022) – Introduced to promote INR settlement of exports/imports.
  • Monetary Policy Objectives – Stability, liquidity, growth promotion.
  • SAARC & BIMSTEC economic cooperation frameworks – Regional economic integration efforts.

Critical Analysis

  • Advantages / Opportunities:
    • Strengthens INR internationalisation, aligning with Atmanirbhar Bharat vision.
    • Helps Nepalese businesses access cheaper institutional credit via Indian banks.
    • Reduces dollar dependency and mitigates forex volatility.
    • Boosts India–Nepal trade, FDI, and supply chain integration.
    • Enhances financial trust and interoperability between RBI and Nepal Rastra Bank.
  • Challenges / Concerns:
    • Risk of credit default or non-repayment across jurisdictions.
    • Need for policy harmonisation between RBI and NRB (Nepal Rastra Bank).
    • Potential perception of Indian dominance in Nepal’s financial system.
    • Compliance complexities with FEMA, KYC, and anti- money laundering norms.
    • INR liquidity management across borders must remain prudent and transparent.

Way Forward

  • Establish a bilateral Rupee Trade Settlement Mechanism (like India–Russia model).
  • Develop joint financial protocols and credit rating frameworks between RBI & NRB.
  • Encourage regional financial institutions under BIMSTEC/South Asian frameworks.
  • Promote INR-denominated instruments (bonds, trade credit) for regional investors.
  • Leverage this to boost cross-border digital payment systems (UPI–NIPL initiatives).
  •  

FOREIGN BANKS EYE INDIA’S GROWTH

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • Emirates NBD Bank (ENBD), UAE’s largest lender, will acquire 60% stake in RBL Bank via $3 billion (₹26,850 crore) primary infusion — one of the largest FDI deals in India’s banking sector.
  • Recent foreign investments in Indian banks:
    • SMBC (Japan) – $1.6 billion for 20% in YES Bank.
    • Abu Dhabi’s IHC – $1 billion controlling stake in Sammaan Capital.
    • Blackstone-backed Asia II Topco XIII – ₹6,196 crore in Federal Bank.
  • Reflects strong global confidence in India’s economic growth and banking reforms.

Key Points

  • Regulatory openness: RBI now more receptive to strategic foreign capital.
  • Improved financial health:  
    • NPAs at record lows.
    • ROA (PSBs): -0.5% (FY19) → 1% (FY25); Private banks: 0.2% → 1.2%.
    • CET Ratio: PSBs – 13%; Private – 16%.
  • Banks positioned for sustained double-digit credit growth.
  • Foreign banks’ interest: India seen as a large, under-penetrated, high-growth market.
  • ENBD–RBL deal to boost trade finance, wealth management, and corporate governance.

Static Linkages

  • FDI Policy:
    • Private banks – FDI up to 74% (automatic up to 49%, govt approval beyond).
    • Public sector banks – FDI up to 20% (govt route).
  • Basel III Norms: Focus on capital adequacy (CET1) and risk management.
  • IBC, 2016: Strengthened asset quality and reduced NPAs.
  • Narasimham Committee Reports: Recommended liberalisation and bank consolidation.
  • Economic Survey 2023–24: Emphasises banking sector resilience and rising credit demand

Critical Analysis

  • Pros
    • Strengthens banks’ capital base and credit capacity.
    • Brings global technology and governance standards.
    • Enhances foreign investor confidence in India’s stability.
    • Supports India’s Viksit Bharat 2047 vision.
  • Cons
    • Possible foreign control in key financial institutions.
    • Cultural and operational integration issues.  Risk of short-term speculative inflows.
    • Need for regulatory vigilance to avoid systemic risks.

Way Forward

  • Maintain prudential caps on foreign ownership.
  • Encourage long-term strategic capital, not short-term inflows.
  • Strengthen RBI supervision of cross-border mergers.
  • Deepen domestic bond markets for capital diversification.
  • Promote bank consolidation and governance reforms.

 

CRUDE POWER PLAY
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • The Trump administration imposed sanctions on Russian oil giants Rosneft and Lukoil, escalating US-Russia economic tensions.
  • The sanctions freeze all US assets of these companies and prohibit American firms from engaging in transactions with them.
  • The move affects India, China, and other countries reliant on Russian crude, potentially inviting secondary sanctions.
  • India is a major importer of Russian crude, especially through Rosneft-linked Nayara Energy’s Gujarat refinery (~4,00,000 bpd).

Key Points

  • Production: Rosneft 3.7 million bpd, Lukoil 1.6 million bpd.
  • Impact on India:
    • Threat to supply security and refining operations.
    • Discounted Russian crude at risk; may need alternative sources.
  • Global Oil Market:
    • Contributes to market fragmentation.  
    • Push for multipolar energy trade, challenging US dollar dominance.
  • Diplomatic Angle:
    • India-US BTA talks ongoing; energy cooperation may reduce Russian dependence.
  • Alternative Payments: Rupee-Rouble, Yuan-Rouble transactions being explored.

Static Linkages

  • Energy Security: Importance of diversified crude supply for national energy security.
  • Global Geopolitics: Historical context of sanctions as a foreign policy tool (e.g., Iran, Iraq).
  • Economic Diplomacy: Bilateral and multilateral trade agreements, e.g., India-US BTA.
  • Currency Systems: Role of reserve currencies in international trade; alternative payment mechanisms.

Critical Analysis

  • Pros: Leverages Russia, pushes India to diversify energy.
  • Cons: Secondary sanctions risk, supply disruption, higher domestic fuel costs.
  • Stakeholders:
    • India: affordable energy vs strategic ties with Russia.
    • Russia: bypass Western financial dominance.
    • US: weaken Russia economically.

Way Forward

  • Diversify crude sources; expand strategic reserves.
  • Increase renewable energy capacity.
  • Use local currency payments to reduce dollar dependency.
  • Strengthen India-US energy cooperation.
TRUST VERSUS FAKE REALITY

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context

  • MeitY proposes amendments to IT Rules, 2021 to regulate AI-generated videos, images, and voices.
  • Public consultation open till 6 November 2025.
  • Goal: Ensure accountability, transparency, and curb deepfakes/misinformation.
  • India aims for a balanced model, avoiding Silicon Valley laissez-faire or Beijing-style control.

Key Points

  • Definition: “Synthetically generated information” = AI-created/altered content resembling authentic media.
  • Labelling: Platforms must mark synthetic content (10% visual space or first 10% audio).
  • Detection: Automated detection systems + user declarations required.
  • Safe Harbour: Intermediaries removing harmful content protected; non-compliance penalized.
  • Challenges: Multilingual, social media-heavy population; risk of viral misinformation.
  • Global Context:
    • EU: Mandatory watermarking.  
    • US: Voluntary compliance.
    • China: Government pre-approval.
  • India’s Proposed Pillars:
  1. Verification Infrastructure: Digital signature for content authenticity.
  2. Tiered Accountability: Higher responsibility for influential platforms.
  3. AI Literacy: Citizens educated to detect

Static Linkages

  • IT Act, 2000 – digital governance & intermediaries.
  • Aadhaar & Digital India – identity/verification systems.
  • Article 19(1)(a) – freedom of speech & responsibility.
  •   Section 79 – safe harbour for intermediaries.
  • Media literacy – democracy & informed citizenry.

Critical Analysis

  • Pros:
    • Curb misinformation and deepfakes.
    • Promote transparency, accountability, and innovation.
  • Cons/Challenges:
    • Enforcement in a vast digital population.
    • “10% disclaimer” may be technically weak.
    • Risk of stifling innovation; requires high citizen literacy.
  • Stakeholders:
    • Government: Ethical AI governance.
    • Platforms/Startups: Compliance costs.
    • Citizens: Awareness to detect manipulation.

Way Forward

  • Build digital provenance framework for authenticity.
  • Implement tiered accountability for platforms.
  • Launch AI and media literacy campaigns.
  • Ensure gradual, enforceable regulation without censorship.
  • Encourage public-private collaboration on detection tools.

 

A VAGUE UNLAWFUL ZONE

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Allahabad High Court refused to quash an FIR against Afaq Ahmad, directing him to face trial over a WhatsApp message.
  • The case was registered under Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which criminalises intentional insults that provoke a breach of public peace.
  • Ahmad’s message alleged political targeting of his brother and called for a boycott of his family’s livelihood.
  • The High Court interpreted the text as carrying a “subtle message” that could promote interfaith enmity.
  • The decision has raised concerns regarding freedom of speech, especially in light of the Supreme Court ruling in Shreya Singhal v.
  • Union of India (2015), which emphasised that penal laws must not be vague.

Key Points

  • FIR lodged under Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (intentional insult provoking breach of peace).
  • WhatsApp text alleged false political targeting of Ahmad’s brother.
  • HC highlighted “subtle messaging” that could incite religious enmity.
  • Legal tension arises between freedom of speech (Article 19(1)(a)) and public order (Article 19(2)).
  • Critics argue the verdict introduces a vague unlawful zone, contrary to Shreya Singhal principles on precision in penal law.

Static Linkages

  • Constitutional Provisions:
    • Article 19(1)(a) – Freedom of Speech and Expression
    • Article 19(2) – Reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order, morality, and security
  • Judicial Precedents:
    • Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) – Struck down Section 66A of IT Act for vagueness.
  • Criminal Law Basics:
    • IPC Sections 153A, 295A, 352 – Criminalisation of acts promoting enmity or insult.
  • Law Enforcement:
    • FIRs can be registered on social media content if it threatens public order.

Critical Analysis

  • Pros:
    • Protects vulnerable communities from subtle forms of targeted harassment.
    • Reinforces public order and societal harmony.
  • Cons / Challenges:
    • Vague interpretation of “subtle messaging” risks arbitrary enforcement.
    • Could create a chilling effect on free speech, discouraging legitimate criticism.
    • Conflicts with Supreme Court precedent requiring legal clarity.
  • Stakeholder Perspectives:
    • Law enforcement: Ensures societal harmony and prevents escalation.
    • Civil society / Legal experts: Warn against overreach and suppression of dissent.
    • Judiciary: Balances rights with public order but must follow clarity standards.

Way Forward

  • Define “subtle messaging” or indirect incitement clearly in law.
  • Encourage judicial guidelines for social media speech to prevent arbitrary FIRs.
  • Promote digital literacy to understand legal boundaries.
  • Periodic review of IPC provisions in light of emerging technology and social media.
  • Strengthen mechanisms for counter-speech rather than punitive action alone.