New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344

20 December 2025

Bangladesh Riots After Leader's | Child Trafficking a Grim Reality: SC | Kerala 2.0: Reclaim Future | Why Defence Industry Matters | Do Not Rush It | Job Law Reforms, Not Rollback | PM Opens Ethiopia Door For Biz | Three Countries, One New Story | Right To Love And Live Freely

BANGLADESH RIOTS AFTER LEADER’S

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Sharif Osman Hadi (32), a prominent leader of Inquilab Mancha and a key figure in the 2024 anti–Sheikh Hasina uprising, died from gunshot injuries.
  • He was shot on December 12 while campaigning for the February parliamentary elections and succumbed to injuries in Singapore.
  • Hadi was a spokesperson of Inquilab Mancha and a prospective candidate from Dhaka-8.

Nature of Protests

  • Violent protests erupted across Dhaka and major cities (Shahbagh, university campuses).
  • Participants included:
    • National Citizen Party (NCP)
    • Bangladesh Islami Chhatra Shibir (student wing of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami)
    • Dhaka University Central Students’ Union (DUCSU)
  • Protests framed Hadi’s killing as political assassination and alleged foreign (Indian) interference.

Attacks on Media Institutions

  • Protesters accused major dailies of being “agents of India”.
  • Prothom Alo (Karwan Bazar):
    • Building stormed, vandalised and set on fire.
    • Journalists and staff trapped inside; building gutted by morning.
  • The Daily Star (Farmgate):
    • Office attacked; equipment looted.
    • Journalists trapped on rooftops; rescued by fire services.
  • Both newspapers:
    • Suspended print publication  
    • Online operations disrupted

Government Response

  • Interim government led by Muhammad Yunus:  
    • Strongly condemned attacks on journalists.
    • Called violence “mob action by fringe elements”.
    • Asserted: “Attacks on journalists are attacks on truth.”
  • Government pledged:
    • Strict legal action against perpetrators.  Protection of press freedom.
  • Yunus personally spoke to editors, assuring state support.

Communal & Law-and-Order Concerns

  • Government also condemned the lynching of a Hindu man in Mymensingh.
  • Stated there is “no space for communal or mob violence in the new Bangladesh.”
  • Highlights fragility of post-uprising transition and risks of radicalisation.

Key Issues for exam Analysis

  • Political Instability: Assassination of opposition leaders can derail democratic transitions.
  • Press Freedom: Media houses targeted as political enemies → chilling effect on journalism.
  • Mob Violence: Weak institutional control during interim governance.
  • Foreign Policy Narrative: Anti-India rhetoric affecting India–Bangladesh relations.
  • Communal Harmony: Minority safety as a test of democratic credentials.

India–Bangladesh Dimension

  • Protests explicitly allege Indian interference.
  • Potential impact on:
    • Bilateral trust
    • Border management
    • Regional stability in South Asia

Way Forward

  • Independent probe into Hadi’s killing.
  • Strong action against mob violence to restore rule of law.
  • Institutional safeguards for media and minorities.  
  • Political dialogue to ensure peaceful elections.
  • Responsible handling of foreign policy narratives by political actors.

CHILD TRAFFICKING A GRIM REALITY: SC

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • The Supreme Court of India flagged child trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation as a continuing organised crime in India.
  • Bench: Justice Manoj Misra & Justice Joymalya Bagchi. Case involved trafficking and sexual exploitation of a minor in Bengaluru (rescued in 2010).
  • Conviction upheld under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956.

Core Observations of the Supreme Court

  • Nature of trafficking:
    • Child trafficking operates through layered and compartmentalised networks— recruitment, transport, harbouring, and exploitation often appear disconnected.
  • Victim testimony:
    • Courts must not disbelieve a trafficked child due to minor inconsistencies.
    • Sole testimony of the victim is sufficient if it is credible and convincing.
  • Legal status of the child:
    • A trafficked child is not an accomplice
    • Her testimony should be treated like that of an “injured witness” in criminal law.
  • Behavioural realism:
    • Failure to immediately protest or escape cannot be treated as unnatural conduct, given fear, coercion, and trauma.
  • Judicial sensitivity:
    • Courts must account for socio-economic, cultural, and psychological vulnerability, especially for children from marginalised backgrounds.

Constitutional & Legal Foundations

  • Article 21: Right to life includes dignity, bodily integrity, and protection from exploitation.
  • Article 15(3): Enables special protection for women and children.
  • Article 39(e) & (f) (DPSPs): Mandates protection of children from abuse and exploitation.
  • ITPA, 1956: Penalises trafficking, brothel- keeping, and exploitation.
  • Child-centric jurisprudence (NCERT Polity + Supreme Court cases):
    • Shift from offender-centric to victim- centric justice.
  • Criminal evidence principle:
    • Quality of evidence > quantity of witnesses (well-established in Indian criminal law).

Why Minor Inconsistencies Should Be Ignored

  • Trafficking victims experience:  Trauma and fear
  • Disorientation due to confinement
  • Psychological pressure from organised gangs
  • Crimes occur in diffused verticals, making precise narration difficult.
  • Expecting photographic memory from a child victim is legally unrealistic and ethically unjust.

Critical Analysis

  • Pros
    • Strengthens victim-centric jurisprudence.
    • Improves conviction rates in trafficking cases.
  • Challenges
    • Enforcement gaps, weak investigation, poor rehabilitation.

Way Forward

  • Trauma-informed training for police and judiciary.
  • Strong rehabilitation and witness protection for victims.
  • Better coordination among police, CWCs, NGOs.

KERALA 2.0: RECLAIM  FUTURE

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • Kerala, earlier known for high literacy, health outcomes, and social development, is now facing serious fiscal, governance, and ecological challenges.
  • The State’s public debt has risen sharply, with borrowing increasingly used to meet revenue expenditure such as salaries and pensions.
  • Debt servicing exceeds development spending, reducing funds for infrastructure and job creation.
  • Economic dependence on remittances, liquor taxes, and lotteries reflects a weak productive base.
  • Rising youth unemployment and migration, environmental degradation, drug abuse, and public safety issues indicate governance stress.

Key Issues

  • Fiscal Stress: Persistent revenue deficits, weak GST buoyancy, shrinking fiscal space.
  • Economic Structure: Remittance-led consumption without sufficient industrialisation or private investment.
  • Governance Deficit: Politicisation of bureaucracy, regulatory overreach, delayed approvals.
  • Human Capital Paradox: High literacy but skill– job mismatch and low local employment.
  • Environmental & Social Concerns: Quarrying, sand mining, drug menace, and public health risks.

Static Linkages

  • Fiscal Responsibility: Revenue vs capital expenditure distinction.
  • Federalism: State finances under GST regime.
  • Governance Theory: Regulatory overreach vs facilitative State.
  • Sustainable Development: Economy– ecology trade-offs.
  • Demographic Dividend: Employment as a necessary condition.
  • Decentralisation: Role of empowered local self-governments.

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Strong social capital and diaspora support.
    • High HDI provides a strong base for transition to a knowledge economy.
    • Scope for leadership in green growth, health, and education services.
  • Concerns
    • Welfare-driven politics without fiscal sustainability.
    • Erosion of work culture and enterprise incentives.
    • Environmental neglect increasing long- term fiscal risk.
  • Ethical Dimension
    • State responsibility to balance welfare with accountability.
    • Governance must prioritise public interest over partisan interest.

Way Forward

  • Restrict borrowing to productive capital expenditure.
  • Adopt a medium-term fiscal consolidation plan.
  • Simplify regulations through single- window, digital clearances.
  • Promote job-rich sectors: green technology, agro-processing, health and knowledge services.
  • Mobilise diaspora savings and strengthen environmental governance.
WHY DEFENCE DEFENCE INDUSTRY
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • India’s goal of becoming a developed nation by 2047 depends not only on economic growth but also on strategic and defence self-reliance.
  • For decades, India’s defence sector was closed to private industry, while imports from foreign private manufacturers continued unabated.
  • This resulted in high import dependence, weak domestic capability, and strategic vulnerability.
  • In recent years, reforms such as private sector entry, FDI liberalisation, corporatisation of the Ordnance Factory Board, and innovation- driven procurement have transformed the sector.
  • Defence exports have expanded rapidly, reaching 80+ countries, indicating a maturing ecosystem. pasted

Key Points

  • Structural shift from a public-sector- dominated model to a mixed ecosystem with private participation.
  • Defence production has increased significantly; exports are targeted at ₹50,000 crore by 2029.
  • Expansion of the “Make” procurement category promotes indigenous design and development.
  • Global conflicts (Europe, West Asia, Indo- Pacific) have exposed vulnerabilities of import- dependent defence systems.
  • India’s cost-effective platforms and strategic geography create export opportunities amid rising global defence demand. pasted

Static Linkages

  • Strategic autonomy as a component of national security.
  • Import substitution vs. export-led growth in strategic industries.
  • Role of public–private partnerships in capital-intensive sectors.
  • Defence manufacturing as a source of technological spillovers and skilled employment.
  • State-led facilitation in strategic exports through diplomacy and Lines of Credit.

Critical Analysis

  • Advantages
    • Reduces import dependence and improves wartime readiness.
    • Defence exports enhance India’s geopolitical influence and strategic credibility.
    • Private participation improves efficiency, innovation, and competition.
    • Generates high-skilled employment and strengthens manufacturing depth.
  • Challenges
    • Complex regulatory environment discourages MSMEs and startups.
    • Delays in export licensing and technology-transfer approvals.
    • Fragmented coordination among multiple ministries.
    • Limited access to affordable finance and export credit.
    • Stringent domestic testing and certification norms slow time-to-market.
  • Institutional Dimension
    • The Defence Research and Development Organisation has built strategic capabilities, but its role must evolve.
    • Frontier research should remain with DRDO, while production and scaling should shift to industry— aligning with global best practices.

Way Forward

  • Simplify and time-bound export licensing and regulatory approvals.
  • Provide long-term defence procurement projections to attract private investment.
  • Establish a dedicated defence export facilitation agency with a single-window approach.
  • Expand integrated testing and certification infrastructure aligned with global standards.
  • Develop specialised defence export financing instruments.
  • Use government-to-government agreements and Lines of Credit strategically to build trust and long- term markets.

DO NOT RUSH IT

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • The Election Commission of India (ECI) released draft electoral rolls after Phase-I of SIR in seven States/UTs.
  • Massive deletions reported: Tamil Nadu (~97 lakh; ~15%) and West Bengal (~58 lakh; ~7.5%), with urban areas like Kolkata most affected.
  • In Bihar, despite the Supreme Court of India allowing Aadhaar, 68 lakh names were deleted; female gender ratio fell from 907 to 892.
  • Court advised ECI to take a “sympathetic view” and consider extension of timelines.
  • Constitutionality of SIR is still pending judicial determination.

Key Points

  • SIR places the burden on voters to submit enumeration forms within a short 53-day window.
  • Reports of strict citizenship proof demands, including parents’ birth details.
  • Reliance on party Booth Level Agents rather than official databases (death registration).
  • Vulnerable groups at higher risk: migrants, women (post-marriage), illiterate and urban poor voters.
  • Administrative stress due to tight timelines and overlapping elections.

Static Linkages

  • Universal Adult Suffrage: Right to vote as a cornerstone of representative democracy (enshrined in constitutional scheme).
  • Articles 324–329: Powers, independence and responsibilities of the Election Commission.
  • Equality Before Law (Article 14): Administrative procedures must not result in arbitrary or disproportionate exclusion.
  • Right to Vote as Statutory Right: Must still comply with constitutional guarantees of fairness and reasonableness.
  • Due Process & Natural Justice: Reasonable notice, opportunity to be heard, and proportionate procedures.
  • Gender Justice: Indirect discrimination recognised when neutral rules disproportionately affect women.
  • Civil Registration System: Importance of birth and death registration in governance and electoral integrity.
  • Judicial Review: Courts as guardians against procedural excess by constitutional authorities.

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Improves roll accuracy by removing duplicates and deceased voters.
    • Judicial intervention (Aadhaar) reduced immediate exclusions.
  • Concerns
    • Scale of deletions suggests procedural overreach.
    • Gender-skewed outcomes indicate indirect discrimination.
    • Short timelines and limited verification weaken due process.
    • Shifting responsibility to voters undermines inclusive democracy.

Way Forward

  • Extend enumeration and hearing timelines.
  • Cross-verify with civil registration and welfare databases.
  • Simplify and standardise proof requirements.  
  • Targeted outreach for vulnerable groups.
  • Early Supreme Court ruling on SIR’s constitutionality.
JOB LAW REFORMS, NOT ROLLBACK

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Debate around the proposed VB-G RAMG Bill centres on concerns of dilution of rural worker rights.
  • The Bill aims to reform India’s rural employment framework by correcting structural and implementation gaps.
  • It seeks to convert an often-frustrated entitlement into a clear, enforceable statutory guarantee pasted

Key Points

  • 125 days of legally guaranteed wage employment per rural household annually.
  • Unemployment allowance payable if work not provided within 15 days.
  • Removal of earlier disentitlement provisions.
  • Strengthened transparency, social audits, and time-bound grievance redressal.
  • Employment linked with productive public asset creation.
  • Four work domains:  Water security
  • Core rural infrastructure  Livelihood infrastructure
  • Climate/extreme weather mitigation
  • Planning through Viksit Gram Panchayat Plans, approved by Gram Sabhas.
  • Creation of a National Rural Infrastructure Stack for coordination and visibility.
  • States may notify up to 60 days as peak agricultural periods with no works.
  • District/block/GP-level flexibility based on agro-climatic conditions.
  • Technology-enabled governance with built-in safeguards against exclusion.

Static Linkages

  • Welfare State Principle – Shift from discretionary schemes to legally enforceable livelihood entitlements.
  • Decentralised Governance – Gram Sabha–led planning reflects bottom-up development and local democracy.
  • Social Audit Mechanism – Community oversight to ensure transparency, accountability, and reduced leakages.
  • Public Works Theory – Wage employment as a tool for poverty reduction and durable rural asset creation.
  • Agriculture–Labour Balance – Recognition of seasonal farm labour demand to avoid crowding-out effects.
  • Climate Adaptation – Employment linked with water security, infrastructure, and climate-resilient assets.
  • Cooperative Federalism – Rule-based funding with state flexibility in implementation.
  • E-Governance & Inclusion – Technology for transparency, complemented by human safeguards.

Critical Analysis

  • Pros
    • Expands employment guarantee and income security.
    • Makes unemployment allowance enforceable.  
    • Corrects long-standing implementation flaws.
    • Integrates livelihood support with durable asset creation.
    • Preserves demand-driven character through statutory obligation.
    • Balances farm labour needs with rural employment.
    • Enhances accountability using technology and social audits.
  • Concerns
    • Fiscal sustainability depends on objective allocation norms.
    • Risk of tech-led exclusion if safeguards fail.
    • Administrative capacity at local levels remains critical.
    • Asset quality and long-term impact need monitoring.

Way Forward

  • Ensure transparent, rule-based fund allocation.  
  • Strengthen Panchayat and block-level capacity.  
  • Combine technology with human oversight.
  • Periodic evaluation of asset quality and livelihood outcomes.
  • Deeper convergence with agriculture, water, and climate schemes.

PM OPEN ETHIPIA DOOR FOR BIZ

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Ethiopia, marking high-level re-engagement after Ethiopia’s internal conflict.
  • Personal diplomacy with PM Abiy Ahmed underscored trust-based bilateral ties.
  • India had earlier supported Ethiopia’s inclusion in BRICS, aiding its global reintegration.
  • Engagement with African Union leadership gains relevance ahead of the India–Africa Forum Summit.

Key Points

  • Bilateral relations elevated to a Strategic Partnership.
  • Cooperation areas: development assistance, education, defence training, security, and capacity building.
  • India doubled scholarships under Indian Council for Cultural Relations and expanded Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation, including AI training.
  • Indian private FDI in Ethiopia exceeds USD 5 billion (one of Ethiopia’s largest sources).
  • Ethiopia seeks Indian collaboration in Digital Public Infrastructure and AI.
  • Ethiopia’s AfCFTA membership positions it as a gateway to eastern Africa.

Static Linkages

  • South–South cooperation in India’s foreign policy
  • Soft power through education and capacity building
  • Development partnership model (non- conditional, demand-driven)
  • Strategic relevance of Horn of Africa and Red Sea corridor

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Strengthens India’s strategic footprint in Africa.
    • Enhances Ethiopia’s defence and human resource capacity.
    • Long-term influence via education and DPI cooperation.
    • Supports India’s Global South leadership narrative.
  • Concerns
    • Absence of structured business delegation reduced immediate economic outcomes.
    • Horn of Africa instability poses geopolitical risks.
    • Ethiopia’s debt stress and IMF conditionalities may deter investors.

Way Forward

  • Institutionalise business engagement through trade missions.
  • Encourage Indian SMEs to leverage AfCFTA via Ethiopia.
  • Expand defence cooperation with focus on regional stability.
  • Establish Indian-supported educational and skill institutions locally.
  • Align bilateral outcomes with India–Africa Forum Summit agenda.

THREE COUNTRIES, ONE NEW STORY

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • Narendra Modi undertook a three-nation tour (Jordan, Ethiopia, Oman) to consolidate India’s strategic presence in West Asia, Horn of Africa, and the Indian Ocean Region.
  • Visit took place amid Gaza conflict diplomacy, US–Iran tensions, Abraham Accords expansion, and heightened great-power rivalry.
  • Aim: safeguard energy security, trade, diaspora interests, maritime security, and Global South leadership.

Key Outcomes

  • Jordan
    • Reviewed ties on 75 years of diplomatic relations.
    • Cooperation on counter-terrorism, regional stability (Gaza), and trade.
  • Ethiopia
    • Bilateral ties elevated to Strategic Partnership.
    • Roadmap for trade, investment, defence cooperation.
    • Coordination with African Union and Global South priorities.
  • Oman
    • Signing of Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA).
    • Focus on trade expansion, job creation, defence and maritime security cooperation.

Static Linkages

  • Strategic autonomy and multipolar diplomacy  Indian Ocean as a strategic commons (SLOC security)
  • Trade agreements as tools of export-led growth
  • Counter-terrorism and regional security cooperation
  • South–South cooperation and development partnerships

Critical Analysis

  • Strengths
    • Reinforces India’s presence across West Asia– Africa–IOR arc.
    • CEPA with Oman boosts economic and strategic convergence.
    • Ethiopia partnership strengthens India’s role in the Horn of Africa.
  • Concerns
    • Chronic implementation gap after high-level visits.
    • Regional instability affecting energy and trade routes.
    • Growing China (economic) and Pakistan (security) influence.

Way Forward

  • Institutionalise time-bound follow-up mechanisms.
  • Use CEPA to integrate MSMEs and value chains.
  • Enhance maritime domain awareness and defence logistics.
  • Expand development finance, skilling, and capacity-building in Africa.
RIGHT TO LOVE AND LIVE FREELY

 

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • The Allahabad High Court directed police to ensure protection to an adult couple in a live- in relationship.
  • Held that cohabitation outside marriage is not illegal and cannot be denied protection due to social disapproval.
  • Judgment comes amid inconsistent application of the UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 in inter-faith live-in cases.
  • Also relevant in the context of increasing state regulation of private relations, such as live-in registration under the Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code.
  • Reinforces constitutional primacy of personal liberty and autonomy.

Key Points

  • Live-in relationships between consenting adults do not constitute an offence.
  • Fundamental rights cannot be eclipsed by social morality or perceived cultural norms.
  • Police have a constitutional obligation to protect life and liberty under Article 21.
  • Constitutional interpretation must be dynamic and aligned with changing social realities.
  • Judgment curbs moral policing and arbitrary denial of protection.

Static Linkages

  • Article 21: Right to life, liberty, privacy, and personal autonomy.
  • Article 14: Equal protection of laws; non- discriminatory state action.
  • Article 19: Freedom of movement and expression enabling choice of partner.
  • Constitutional morality as guiding principle (Ambedkar).
  • Rule of law and limits on executive discretion.

Critical Analysis

  • Significance
    • Strengthens Supreme Court jurisprudence protecting choice of partner.
    • Shields inter-faith and inter-caste couples from coercion and violence.
    • Clarifies police role as neutral protectors, not moral arbiters.
  • Challenges
    • Conflict with state laws mandating registration of live-in relationships.
    • Persistent social and institutional bias at ground level.
    • Federal variation leading to uneven protection across states.
  • Constitutional Dimension
    • Affirms constitutional morality over majoritarian morality.
    • Reinforces privacy doctrine post Puttaswamy judgment.

Way Forward

  • Issue clear police SOPs anchored in Article 21.
  • Ensure proportionality and privacy safeguards in state family laws.
  • Judicial and police sensitisation against moral policing.
  • Strengthen legal awareness and access to remedies for vulnerable couples.