New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344

15 December 2025

Gunmen Kill 11 at Sydney Event | Courts Must Defend Free Speech | Time to Boost India–Ethiopia Ties | Time To Pause | An Anomaly | People-Led Climate Intelligence Movement | Are India’s Methane Emissions Missed | Ship Leasing Takes Off GIFT City | Why India’s FTAs Go Beyond Economics | India–Russia Ties: Rise and Fall | NHRC Order on Custody Death

GUNMEN KILL 11 AT SYDNEY EVENT

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Terrorist attack on a Jewish Hanukkah event at Bondi Beach, Sydney.
  • 11 killed, 29 injured, including police personnel.
  • Attack occurred on the first day of Hanukkah, a major Jewish festival.
  • Australian authorities confirmed it as a terrorist attack.
  • Worst mass shooting in Australia since Port Arthur massacre, 1996.
  • Part of a wider rise in antisemitic attacks globally after the Israel–Gaza war (Oct 2023).
  • India and other global leaders strongly condemned the attack.

Key Points

  • Automatic firearms used; suspected IEDs found.
  • One attacker killed; another critically injured; third suspect probed.
  • One attacker known to intelligence agencies earlier.
  • About 1,000 people attended the event.
  • Australia has strict gun laws; mass shootings are rare.
  • Jewish population in Australia: ~1.17 lakh.

Static Linkages

  • Terrorism as a non-state asymmetric threat.
  • Religious freedom as a democratic and human right.
  • Hate crimes undermining social cohesion.
  • Intelligence failure vs. civil liberties dilemma.
  • Spillover of international conflicts into domestic security.
  • India’s doctrine of zero tolerance to terrorism.

Critical Analysis

  • Strengths
    • Quick police response and emergency coordination.
    • Strong political condemnation and global solidarity.
  • Concerns
    • Intelligence lapse despite prior knowledge of attacker.
    • Rising religious extremism and hate speech.
    • Vulnerability of soft targets like religious events.
    • Risk of social polarisation.

Way Forward

  • Improve preventive intelligence and profiling.
  • Secure religious and cultural gatherings
  • Counter online radicalisation and hate speech.
  • Strengthen community policing and social dialogue.
  • Enhance international counter-terror cooperation.

COURTS MUST DEFEND FREE SPEECH

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • In Ranveer Allahbadia vs Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court raised concerns over online content regulation.
  • On November 27, 2025, the Court remarked that self-styled bodies are inadequate and suggested neutral, autonomous regulators.
  • It also advised the Union government to publish draft regulatory guidelines and invite public comments.
  • Earlier, on March 3, 2025, the Court expanded the case’s scope to examine regulation of content “offensive to moral standards”.
  • These observations triggered debate on judicial overreach, separation of powers, and free speech.

Key Points

  •  India already has extensive legal provisions regulating speech and online conduct.
  • IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 create a centralised oversight mechanism.
  • The Rules impose vague standards like “due caution and discretion”, amounting to prior restraint.
  • Judicial push for further regulation risks constitutional overreach and chilling effects on speech.
  • Regulation of content policy traditionally lies within the legislative domain.

Static Linkages

  • Fundamental rights are subject only to reasonable restrictions expressly enumerated.
  • Separation of powers limits judicial involvement in law-making.
  • Prior restraint is constitutionally disfavoured.
  • Courts act as constitutional arbiters, not policy designers.
  • Democratic systems prefer post- publication remedies.

Critical Analysis

  • Concerns
    • Expanding the scope beyond the original dispute weakens judicial discipline.
    • “Moral standards of society” is vague and constitutionally unsafe.
    • Additional restrictions beyond Article 19(2) violate settled precedent (Kaushal Kishor, 2023).
    • Judicially prompted regulation may legitimise pre-censorship.
    • Courts lack institutional capacity for complex digital governance.
  • Counter-view
    • Judiciary responding to regulatory gaps and social harms.
    • Emphasis on public consultation shows procedural caution.

Way Forward

  • Strict adherence to Article 19(2).
  • Prefer content removal after due process, not prior restraint.
  • Any new regulation must follow parliamentary debate.
  • Ensure narrow, clear, and proportionate standards.
  • Judicial restraint in policy advocacy.
  • Learn from democracies focusing on enforcement, not censorship.

TIME TO BOOST INDIA-ETHIOPIA TIES

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed Ali at the G-20 Summit in Johannesburg, signalling renewed momentum in bilateral ties.
  • Ethiopia (population ~109 million, 2024) is a key political and economic anchor in the Horn of Africa and hosts the African Union headquarters.
  • Ethiopia’s post-conflict reconstruction phase and BRICS membership create scope for deeper strategic and economic engagement with India.

Key Points

  • Geostrategic Importance: Ethiopia shapes Red Sea and East African security despite being landlocked; seeks diversified sea access via Djibouti, Somaliland, and Eritrea.
  • Economic Profile: One of Africa’s fastest- growing economies with a large domestic market, manufacturing base, and major hydropower potential.
  • Education Cooperation:
    • Over a century of Indian role in Ethiopian education.
    • Pilot country for Pan-African e-Network Project (2007).
    • Highest number of African PhD students in India.
  • Investment:
    • Indian investments exceed USD 4 billion since 2006 LoCs.
    • High potential in gold, critical minerals, and rare earths.
  • Defence Cooperation:
    • Military ties since 1956 (Harar Military Academy).
    • New Defence MoU and Joint Defence Cooperation Committee in 2024.
  • Trade & Regional Access:
    • AfCFTA enables Ethiopia-based Indian firms to access continental markets.
    • India’s DFTP scheme supports Ethiopian exports.

Static Linkages

  • South–South Cooperation Lines of Credit as development diplomacy
  • Strategic constraints of landlocked states  
  • Energy security and critical minerals
  • Diaspora-led economic engagement

Critical Analysis

  • Pros
    • Secures critical mineral supply chains for India’s green transition.
    • Defence exports support Atmanirbhar Bharat.
    • Education cooperation strengthens India’s soft power.
    • Ethiopia as a manufacturing hub under AfCFTA.
  • Challenges
    • Political fragility and post-conflict recovery.
    • Foreign exchange shortages and regulatory uncertainty.
    • Infrastructure and logistics bottlenecks.  
    • IMF conditionalities limiting fiscal space.

Way Forward

  • Update DTAA and Bilateral Investment Treaty.
  • Structured mining partnerships with sustainability norms.
  • Expand digital education and skill development.
  • Calibrated defence Lines of Credit within IMF rules.
  • Use BRICS and G-20 platforms for development finance.
  • Address forex constraints through institutional mechanisms.
TIME TO PAUSE
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • Retail inflation (CPI) fell to 0.7% in Nov 2025, the second-lowest ever; Oct 2025 recorded the lowest.
  • The fall is driven mainly by high base effects and food price contraction.
  • RBI MPC cut repo rate to 5.25% in Dec 2025 after cumulative 125 bps cuts in 2025.
  • A new CPI series (base year 2024) is expected in FY 2026–27.
  • Debate on whether the MPC should pause rate cuts in Feb 2026.

Key Points

  • Base Effect:
    • Inflation in Oct–Nov 2024 was 6.2% and 5.5%.
    • High base suppresses current inflation; effect likely to fade by mid-2026.
  • CPI Skew:
    • Food & beverages ~46% weight in CPI.
    • Food prices fell 2.8% (Nov 2025), pulling down headline inflation.
    • Decline is largely statistical, not structural.
  • CPI Revision:
    • Base year shift from 2012 to 2024.
    • Reweighted basket to reflect current consumption.
    • Food’s dominance expected to reduce.
  • Monetary Policy:
    • Sharp easing already done; transmission still unfolding.
    • Case for pause to assess growth, Budget 2026 impact, and new CPI.

Static Linkages

  • CPI uses Laspeyres index.
  • Importance of base year revision in price indices.
  • Central bank mandate of price stability with growth.
  • Lagged transmission of monetary policy.

Critical Analysis

  • Pros
    • Low inflation eases household pressure.
    • Rate cuts support growth amid slowdown.
    • CPI rebasing improves data credibility.
  • Concerns
    • Disinflation driven by temporary base effects.  
    • High food weight distorts inflation signal.
    • Further cuts risk policy overreach.

Way Forward

  • Pause rate cuts until base effects normalize.  
  • Evaluate post-Budget fiscal impact.
  • Closely track core inflation.
  • Use new CPI series for recalibrating policy.

AN ANOMALY

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • The Union Environment Ministry informed Parliament that Punjab and Haryana reduced farm fire incidences by 90% in 2025 compared to 2022, based on satellite fire counts.
  • Crop residue (stubble) burning, mainly of paddy, is linked to severe October–November air pollution in Delhi-NCR.
  • Governments adopted a carrot-and-stick approach: fines, subsidised machinery, and incentives for biomass utilisation.
  • Independent analysis using burnt-area data and geostationary satellites shows only a ~30% reduction in actual burned land, with fires shifting to evening hours.
  • The Supreme Court (2024) directed authorities to assess burnt area, but official year-wise data remain unpublished.

Key Points

  • Government claims rely on active fire counts from polar-orbiting satellites with limited daytime coverage.
  • Burnt area better reflects the true scale of burning and pollution impact.
  • Geostationary satellites show temporal shifting of fires to avoid detection.
  • Different satellite resolutions create uncertainty in true fire estimates.
  • Lack of transparent data risks misleading policy evaluation.

Static Linkages

  • Biomass burning as a source of particulate pollution
  • Remote sensing and environmental monitoring  Federal environmental governance
  • Precautionary principle and public trust doctrine

Critical Analysis

  • Strengths
    • Expansion of residue-management machinery  Biomass co-firing in thermal plants
    • Judicial push for scientific assessment
  • Limitations
    • Over-reliance on fire counts instead of burnt area
    • Farmers adapting behaviour to evade monitoring
    • Weak transparency despite court directions
  • Governance Issues
    • Data selectivity erodes public trust
    • Policy outcomes overstated without robust metrics

Way Forward

  • Publish annual burnt-area estimates using multiple satellites
  • Integrate geostationary + polar satellite data  
  • Ensure assured economic returns for residue collection
  • Promote crop diversification beyond paddy  
  • Enable independent scientific audits of pollution claims
NHRC ORDER ON CUSTODY DEATH

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) ordered ₹10 lakh compensation to the family of a man who died in police custody (2021).
  • The order comes amid persistent concerns over custodial deaths:
    • 4,400+ custodial deaths (2020–2022) nationwide.
    • Uttar Pradesh: 952 deaths (highest).
  • The decision gains significance as NHRC’s international accreditation was deferred (2024) due to concerns over transparency and appointments.

Key Points

  • Custodial deaths include deaths in police and judicial custody.
  • NHRC recommendations are advisory, not binding.
  • Status of Policing in India Report 2025:
    • Survey of 8,276 police personnel across 17 States/UTs.
    • Shows notable acceptance of coercive policing methods.
  • Gujarat State Law Commission (2023) termed rising custodial deaths a serious public concern.
  • NHRC was established under the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.

Static Linkages

  • Article 21: Right to Life and Personal Liberty.  DK Basu vs State of West Bengal (1997):
    • Mandatory safeguards against custodial torture.
  • Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993:
  • NHRC can investigate, recommend compensation, and suggest reforms.
  • UNCAT:
    • India is a signatory, not a ratifying state.
  • 2nd ARC (5th Report):
  • Emphasised police accountability and oversight.

Critical Analysis

  • Significance
    • Reaffirms human dignity in state custody.
    • Signals accountability to law enforcement agencies.
    • Helps restore NHRC’s normative relevance.
  • Limitations
    • Orders are non-enforceable.
    • Compensation does not ensure criminal accountability.
    • Weak enforcement, political sensitivity, and absence of an anti-torture law persist.

Way Forward

  • Enact a standalone anti-custodial torture law.
  • Make NHRC recommendations time-bound and enforceable.
  • Reform NHRC appointments for independence and diversity.
  • Strengthen police training, CCTV coverage, and independent inquiries.
  • Enhance judicial and parliamentary oversight.
PEOPLE -LED CLIMATE INTELLIGENCE MOVEMENT

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Under the Paris Agreement, countries must track emissions, adaptation and climate finance through robust MRV systems.
  • COP30 reinforced this via the Global Implementation Tracker, Belém Mission to 1.5°C, and indicators for the Global Goal on Adaptation.
  • India has stressed that stronger domestic MRV is vital for transparency and access to climate finance, while developing countries need financial and technical support.
  • Tamil Nadu’s Community-based MRV (CbMRV) initiative integrates community-generated environmental data into formal climate governance.
  • Piloted since 2023 under the UK PACT programme, it marks a shift towards bottom- up climate intelligence.

Key Points

  • CbMRV enables villages to produce science- ready, local-scale environmental data often missed by remote sensing.
  • Combines traditional ecological knowledge with monitoring of rainfall, temperature, soil and water health, biodiversity, fisheries, crops, livelihoods and carbon stocks.
  • Implemented across three landscapes:
    • Aracode (Nilgiris) – forest and tribal systems
    • Vellode (Erode) – agriculture and wetlands
    • Killai (Cuddalore) – mangroves and coastal fisheries
  • Data feeds into a digital dashboard used at village, district and State levels.
  • 35 Key Community Stakeholders (KCS) trained as community climate stewards. Carbon feasibility studies show scope for community-centred carbon projects.
  • Supports State initiatives such as SAPCC, Tamil Nadu Climate Tracker, Green Tamil Nadu Mission and coastal adaptation planning.

Static Linkages

  • Decentralisation and participatory governance.
  • Sustainable development and intergenerational equity.
  • Community-based natural resource management.
  • Climate adaptation as a development challenge.
  • Integration of indigenous and scientific knowledge systems.

Critical Analysis

  • Strengths
    • Democratises climate governance and improves data granularity.
    • Strengthens evidence for climate finance and carbon markets.
    • Builds a local green workforce and supports just transition goals.
  • Challenges
    • Long-term financing and institutionalisation.
    • Ensuring data quality, standardisation and scalability.  
    • Sustaining community engagement over time.
  • Ethical Dimension
    • Advances climate justice by empowering frontline communities most affected by climate change.

Way Forward

  • Integrate CbMRV with national MRV and Biennial Transparency Reports.
  • Institutionalise training via ITIs, Panchayat Raj institutions and State skill missions.
  • Create funding windows for community-led adaptation and MRV.
  • Develop national standards for community-generated climate data.

ARE INDIA’S METHANE EMISSIONS MISSED

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Methane, 84 times more potent than CO₂ over 20 years, fuels landfill fires and accelerates climate change (IPCC).
  • About 15% of India’s methane emissions come from the waste sector.
  • ISRO (2023) used satellite data to identify major methane-emitting landfills such as Ghazipur, Bhalswa, Pirana, Deonar, and Kanjurmarg.
  • The National Green Tribunal (NGT) constituted committees for ground verification.
  • New satellite missions (CarbonMapper, SRON, ClimateTRACE) reveal large gaps between model-based estimates and real emissions.
  • Waste-sector methane mitigation is emerging as a low-cost, high-impact climate opportunity.

Key Points

  • Methane is generated by anaerobic decomposition of organic waste in landfills.
  • Traditional estimates rely on outdated, aggregated waste data and emission models.
  • Global studies show landfill methane emissions can be ~1.8 times higher than model estimates.
  • India-specific discrepancies:
    • Delhi: Two landfills emit nearly as much methane as the city’s entire estimated waste sector (2018).
    • Mumbai: Kanjurmarg landfill emissions are ~10 times model estimates.
    • Ahmedabad: Pirana landfill alone rivals Gujarat’s total waste-sector estimate.
  • Satellite data types:
    • Regional monitoring (frequent, km- scale).
    • High-resolution hotspot detection (site-specific action).

Static Linkages

  • Methane classified as a Short-Lived Climate Pollutant (SLCP) (IPCC).
  • Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 mandate scientific landfilling and gas capture.
  • Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban) promotes biomethanation and landfill remediation.
  • Gobardhan Scheme supports waste-to- biogas/Bio-CNG.
  • Paris Agreement emphasises robust MRV systems.

Critical Analysis

  • Opportunities
    • Satellites enable rapid identification of methane hotspots.
    • Waste-sector action yields immediate climate benefits.
    • Supports targeted, evidence-based interventions.
    • Co-benefits: cleaner cities, fire prevention, energy recovery.
  • Challenges
    • Satellite data limited by cloud cover and weather.  
    • Lack of updated, city-level waste data.
    • Institutional silos between ULBs and SPCBs.  
    • Weak on-ground capacity for quick response.

Way Forward

  • Expand nationwide satellite methane monitoring of landfills.
  • Create ground-validation teams in major cities.
  • Develop a centralised methane data portal linking ULBs and regulators.
  • Integrate methane reduction targets into Swachh Bharat Mission.
  • Scale up biomethanation and landfill gas-to- energy projects.
  • Use satellite–ground feedback loops for performance-based urban incentives.

SHIP LEASING TAKES OFF GIFT CITY

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • Ship leasing at GIFT City IFSC has expanded rapidly within two years of launch.
  • As of October 2025, 27 ship-leasing entities operate from GIFT IFSC.
  • The number of vessels leased or purchased has doubled to 30 in one year.
  • India now has its first regulator-monitored ship-leasing framework, overseen by IFSCA.
  • The move signals a shift of maritime finance from offshore hubs to an Indian jurisdiction.

Key Points

  • Asset Profile
    • Total leased asset value: $1.47 billion.
    • Bulk carriers dominate (43%): 13 vessels (75,500–106,000 DWT).
    • Largest vessel: 150,000 DWT Suezmax crude oil tanker.
    • Other vessels: Ethane carriers (6), container ships (5), LPG tankers (3), product tanker (1).
  • Flag Mix
    • 17 Indian-flagged vessels.
    • Foreign flags: Marshall Islands, Panama, Portugal, Singapore.
  • Financial Ecosystem
    • Nine entities raised $71.1 million from GIFT- based institutions.
  • Capital norms:
    • $200,000 (operating lease)  $3 million (financial/hybrid lease)
    • Transactions allowed in freely convertible foreign currencies.
  • Comparative Insight
    • Aviation leasing remains larger (253 assets leased).
    • Unified regulation for aviation and shipping under IFSCA is globally rare.

Static Linkages

  • Maritime Trade: ~95% of India’s trade by volume moves by sea.
  • IFSC Framework: Enabled under SEZ Act, 2005; IFSCA set up under IFSCA Act, 2019.
  • Ship Registry: India follows a closed registry system.
  • Policy Alignment: Maritime India Vision 2030, Sagarmala, Blue Economy, Atmanirbhar Bharat.
  • Infrastructure Finance: Infrastructure status enables cheaper long-term capital.

Critical Analysis

  • Advantages
    • Reduces reliance on offshore leasing hubs.
    • Improves regulatory oversight and financial transparency.
    • Supports Indian shipyards and domestic maritime capacity.
    • Positions India as a combined aviation–maritime leasing hub.
  • Challenges
    • Closed ship registry reduces global flexibility.
    • SEZ Rule 29B creates procedural hurdles for short-term charters.
    • Delays in ship mortgage creation and enforcement.
    • Shipping lacks full infrastructure sub-sector status.
    • Limited clarity on ancillary services (broking, management, container leasing).

Way Forward

  • Notify shipping as an infrastructure sub-sector.   Simplify SEZ rules for ship leasing transactions.
  • Speed up mortgage registration and enforcement.  Enable ancillary maritime services in IFSC.
  • Align reforms with Maritime India Vision 2030.
WHY INDIA’S FTAs GO BEYONG ECONOMICS
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • India is negotiating multiple FTAs/RTAs with countries such as New Zealand, Oman, Chile, Israel, Canada, alongside existing agreements with ASEAN, Japan, Korea, Australia, UAE.
  • This push comes amid WTO paralysis, global trade fragmentation, and shifting Indo-Pacific geopolitics.
  • Evidence from India’s older RTAs shows limited trade gains, raising questions about their primary purpose.
  • Growing US–China rivalry and uncertainty around the QUAD have altered the role of trade agreements globally.

Key Points

  • India has ~18 RTAs/PTAs in force across regions.
  • Only 8 include services, despite India’s strength in services exports.
  • Analysis of RTAs with ASEAN, Japan, and Korea shows:
    • No meaningful rise in India’s intra-RTA trade share.
    • Focus on commodities where partner tariffs were already low.
  • Services liberalisation remains weak, except partial progress with Singapore and South Korea.
  • RTAs increasingly serve as:
    • Platforms for WTO-plus issues (investment, digital trade).
    • Instruments of foreign policy and strategic alignment.
    • MEA’s role in trade agreements is expanding alongside the Commerce Ministry.

Static Linkages

  • RTAs permitted under GATT Article XXIV and GATS Article V.
  • Trade creation vs trade diversion theory explains limited net gains.
  • Services form ~55% of India’s GDP and ~40% of exports (Economic Survey).
  • WTO stalemate has accelerated bilateralism and regionalism.

Critical Analysis

  • Pros
    • Provide strategic insurance in an unstable global order.
    • Enable cooperation beyond WTO limits.  
    • Strengthen geopolitical partnerships.
  • Cons
    • Weak trade creation for India.
    • Manufacturing faces import pressure and rules-of-origin misuse.
    • India’s services advantage remains underleveraged.
    • Multilateral trade system gets further fragmented.

Way Forward

  • Prioritise deep services commitments, especially Mode-4 mobility.
  • Tighten rules of origin and safeguard mechanisms.
  • Conduct ex-post impact assessments of RTAs.
  • Align trade policy with domestic industrial and export strategies.
  • Balance geopolitical goals with clear economic outcomes.

INDIA- RUSSIA TIES: RISE AND FALL

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • The 23rd India–Russia Annual Summit (December) reaffirmed political continuity amid global instability.
  • Outcomes were limited, with no major defence or strategic deals announced.
  • Agreements focused on pharmaceutical and fertiliser joint ventures and people-to-people exchanges.
  • The summit reflected both resilience and stagnation in the bilateral relationship.

Key Points

  • Political Engagement
    • Regular high-level contacts continue, signalling diplomatic stability.
  • Economic Engagement
    • Russia sees India as a safe economic destination amid Western sanctions.
    • A strong Russian delegation from economic and banking sectors attended.
  • Financial Integration
    • Five Russian banks operate in India
    • Russian Central Bank to open a Mumbai branch by 2026.
    • Rupee–rouble settlements have expanded significantly.
  • Trade Profile
    • Bilateral trade has surged due to Russian crude oil imports.
    • Trade remains imbalanced and oil-centric.
  • Defence Cooperation
    • No new announcements; talks remain ongoing amid geopolitical sensitivities linked to Ukraine.

Static Linkages

  • Strategic partnerships and India’s multi- alignment doctrine.
  • Energy security as a component of national security.
  • Defence indigenisation and technology transfer.
  • Use of alternative financial systems under sanctions pressure.

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Enduring trust from Cold War-era ties.
    • Energy cooperation supports short-term energy security.
    • Growing financial integration reduces dollar dependence.
  • Concerns
    • Lack of diversification beyond hydrocarbons.  
    • No clarity on future strategic domains.
    • Sanctions-related financial and reputational risks.

Way Forward

  • Diversify trade into technology, pharmaceuticals, agriculture and critical minerals.
  • Revive defence ties via joint development aligned with Atmanirbhar Bharat.
  • Strengthen institutional mechanisms for currency settlements.
  • Identify new cooperation areas beyond traditional sectors