SC Steps into Bengal SIR | India Joins US Tech Alliance | Gen Z Shapes Democracy | Bhasha in Multilingual India | Treatise For Federalism | Safet First | Net FDI Negative Again | AI Shifts State-Capital Axis | Medical AI Must Ensure Equity | Classrooms Face AI Challenge
SC STEP INTO BENGAL SIR
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- The Supreme Court of India intervened in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal.
- The dispute arose between the State government and the Election Commission of India (ECI) over personnel deployment and procedural issues.
- The Court directed the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court to deploy serving/retired District Judges to perform quasi-judicial functions of Electoral Registration Officers (EROs).
- The intervention was termed “extraordinary” due to a stalemate affecting the timely completion of electoral roll revision.
Key Constitutional & Legal Provisions
- Article 324 – Superintendence, direction and control of elections vested in ECI.
- Articles 325–326 – No exclusion from electoral roll on discriminatory grounds; universal adult suffrage.
- Representation of the People Act, 1950 – Preparation and revision of electoral rolls.
- Representation of the People Act, 1951 – Conduct of elections.
- Right to Vote – Statutory right (not a Fundamental Right).
- Free and Fair Elections – Part of Basic Structure (Indira Nehru Gandhi case, 1975).
Institutional & Governance Dimensions
- Tension between two constitutional functionaries (State Executive & ECI).
- Judicial intervention to ensure timely electoral process.
- Questions regarding:
- Separation of powers
- Judicial overreach vs judicial review
- Institutional trust deficit
- Autonomy of constitutional bodies
Importance for Exam
- Prelims
- Constitutional Articles related to elections.
- Difference between statutory and fundamental rights.
- Role and powers of ECI.
- Quasi-judicial authorities.
- GS Paper 2
- Constitutional bodies: powers, functions and limitations.
- Government policies & interventions. Separation of powers.
- Electoral reforms.
- GS Paper 4
- Constitutional morality.
- Institutional integrity.
- Ethical governance.
Critical Analysis
- Positives
- Safeguards free and fair elections.
- Ensures time-bound completion of electoral revision.
- Strengthens public confidence in electoral processes.
- Concerns
- Possible blurring of separation of powers.
- Judicial officers diverted from regular judicial work.
- Precedent of judiciary entering administrative space.
Way Forward
- Strengthen ECI’s independent secretariat.
- Clear statutory mechanism for dispute resolution in roll revision.
- Better coordination protocols between ECI and State governments.
- Greater digitization and verification safeguards.
INDIA JOINS U.S. TECH ALLIANCE
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- India joined the Pax Silica group during the AI Impact Summit.
- The declaration was signed by Union Minister for Electronics and IT and the U.S. Undersecretary of State.
- Pax Silica includes the United States, Canada, Japan, South Korea, and the European Union.
- Objective: Build resilient supply chains for electronics, semiconductors, and critical minerals.
- Background: Growing global concern over excessive dependence on China for rare earth processing and electronics value chains.
Key Points
- Focus areas:
- Semiconductor manufacturing
- Rare earth elements (REEs)
- Critical minerals
- Trusted electronics ecosystem
- China accounts for:
- ~60–70% of global rare earth processing (USGS data).
- Dominant share in battery-grade lithium refining (IEA estimates).
- India initiatives linked:
- India Semiconductor Mission (₹76,000 crore package).
- Production Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme for electronics.
- National Mineral Policy, 2019. Critical Minerals List (2023).
Static Linkages
- Union List Entry 41: Trade and commerce with foreign countries.
- National Mineral Policy, 2019 – Strategic and critical minerals.
- Atmanirbhar Bharat – Supply chain resilience.
- Make in India – Electronics manufacturing push.
- Rare Earth Elements:
- Used in defence systems, EVs, wind turbines, semiconductors.
- Found in monazite sands (Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Odisha).
Critical Analysis
- Significance
- Reduces “weaponised interdependence”.
- Enhances India’s semiconductor and electronics ecosystem.
- Strengthens strategic alignment with democratic economies.
- Supports supply chain diversification (“friend- shoring”).
- Concerns
- India lacks advanced semiconductor fabrication capacity.
- Environmental risks from mineral extraction.
- High capital and technological barriers.
- Possible geopolitical tensions with China.
Way Forward
- Accelerate semiconductor fab implementation.
- Promote rare earth recycling and processing capacity.
- Increase R&D investment in chip design and materials science.
- Integrate Pax Silica strategy with Indo-Pacific policy.
- Ensure sustainable mining practices.
GEN Z SHAPES DEMOCRACY
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- Recent regime-challenging youth-led protests in Bangladesh (2024) and Nepal (2025) have drawn global attention.
- These protests were largely spearheaded by Generation Z (born 1997–2012).
- Issues mobilised around:
- Corruption
- Institutional accountability
- Transparency in governance
- Globally, democracies have been witnessing signs of democratic backsliding (as noted in reports such as Freedom House and V-Dem indices).
- Compared with earlier mass movements like:
- Occupy Wall Street (2011)
- Arab Spring (2010–12)
- Brazilian Spring (2013)
- The new protests are:
- More decentralised Leaderless
- Digitally mobilised
- Episodic but high-impact
Key Points
- Gen Z protests are:
- Technology-driven
- Platform-centric (social media mobilisation)
- Less ideologically structured Leaderless and decentralised
- Characterised by:
- Radical individualism
- Reduced prejudice (caste/religion)
- Strong assertion of personal dignity
- Episodic mobilisation rather than sustained agitation
- Reflect:
- Economic precarity (high youth unemployment — Periodic Labour Force Survey data)
- Rising mental health concerns (National Mental Health Survey)
- Frustration with toxic institutional cultures
- Market and technology act as:
- Social equalisers Identity shapers
- Risk:
- Digital echo chambers Hyper-nationalism
- Fragmented civic engagement
Static Linkages
- Democracy: Defined in NCERT as government by consent and participation.
- Article 19(1)(a) & 19(1)(b) – Freedom of speech and peaceful assembly.
- Basic Structure Doctrine – Democracy and rule of law are part of basic structure.
- Directive Principles (Art. 38, 39) – Promote social justice and reduce inequality.
- 73rd & 74th Amendments – Grassroots democratic participation.
- Economic Survey – Youth demographic dividend.
- Second ARC Report on Ethics in Governance – Transparency and accountability.
- Right to Information Act, 2005 – Institutional accountability mechanism.
- Digital India Mission – Technology-enabled governance.
Critical Analysis
- Positive Dimensions
- Revitalisation of democratic participation.
- Greater demand for transparency and accountability.
- Reduced caste/religious prejudice.
- Digital literacy enhancing information access.
- Assertion of dignity and rights.
- Concerns
- Lack of sustained leadership.
- Episodic and short-lived mobilisation.
- Weak structural understanding of systemic inequality.
- Susceptibility to misinformation.
- Hyper-nationalistic digital mobilisation.
- Economic insecurity leading to political volatility.
- Stakeholders
- Youth population (India: ~65% below 35 years – Census/Economic Survey).
- Governments and policymakers.
- Civil society organisations.
- Digital platforms.
- Judiciary (protector of civil liberties).
Way Forward
- Strengthen civic education in schools and universities.
- Promote institutionalised youth participation (e.g., youth councils).
- Improve employment generation (Skill India, Startup India).
- Enhance digital literacy to counter misinformation.
- Strengthen mental health support systems.
- Encourage structured dialogue platforms between youth and government.
- Reform political party internal democracy to attract youth leadership.
- Strengthen local self-governance participation mechanisms.
BHASHA IN MULTILINGUAL INDIA
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
- 21 February observed as International Mother Language Day by UNESCO.
- UNESCO’s State of the Education Report for India 2025 (7th Edition) titled “Bhasha Matters: Mother Tongue and Multilingual Education” highlights status and roadmap for MTB-MLE in India.
- Census 2011:
- 1,300+ mother tongues reported.
- 121 languages spoken by more than 10,000 persons.
- 22 languages in the Eighth Schedule.
- NCERT (2022): ~44% of children begin schooling in a language different from their home language.
- National Education Policy (NEP 2020) recommends mother tongue/local language as medium of instruction at least till Grade 5 (preferably Grade 8).
Key Points
- Global Data (UNESCO):
- Over 250 million learners lack access to education in a language they fully understand.
- Educational Implications:
- Language mismatch → weak foundational literacy & numeracy (FLN).
- Higher dropout rates and learning poverty.
- Constitutional Backing:
- Article 350A – Facilities for instruction in mother tongue at primary stage for linguistic minorities.
- Articles 29 & 30 – Cultural and educational rights of minorities.
- Eighth Schedule – 22 recognized languages.
- Policy Framework:
- NEP 2020 – Multilingualism as pedagogical principle.
- National Curriculum Framework (2022, 2023) aligns with multilingual education.
- Digital Initiatives:
- DIKSHA
- BHASHINI
- PM eVIDYA
- AI-based language tools (AI4Bharat etc.)
- State Example:
- Odisha’s MLE programme covers 21 tribal languages across 17 districts (~90,000 students).
Static Linkages
- Fundamental Rights – Articles 14, 21A (Right to Education).
- Directive Principles – Article 46 (Promotion of educational interests of weaker sections).
- Three-Language Formula (1968, revised in NEP 2020).
- Census methodology for linguistic classification.
- Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (NIPUN Bharat Mission).
- Cultural pluralism and unity in diversity (Indian Society).
Critical Analysis
- Advantages
- Improves learning outcomes in early grades. Reduces dropout rates.
- Protects linguistic diversity and indigenous knowledge.
- Promotes equity and inclusion.
- Strengthens national integration through respect for diversity.
- Challenges
- Shortage of trained multilingual teachers.
- Lack of standardized multilingual textbooks.
- Political sensitivities around language.
- Financial constraints in resource-poor states.
- Balancing global competitiveness (English proficiency) with local language promotion.
Way Forward
- Formulate clear State-level Language-in- Education Policies.
- Establish National Mission for MTB-MLE.
- Strengthen teacher recruitment & multilingual pedagogy training.
- Invest in AI-driven translation and content creation (BHASHINI).
- Community participation in preserving tribal/indigenous languages.
TREATISE FOR FEDERALISM
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
- The Government of Tamil Nadu constituted a High-Level Committee on Union–State relations.
- Chaired by former Supreme Court Judge Justice Kurian Joseph.
- The Committee examined:
- Increasing centralisation of powers. Weakening of federal democracy.
- Need for a “structural reset” in Indian federalism.
- The report draws upon:
- Constituent Assembly Debates. Reports of:
- Sarkaria Commission
- Punchhi Commission
- Rajamannar Committee
- It critiques recent governance trends that allegedly reduce the autonomy of States.
Key Constitutional and Governance Issues
- Tilt Towards Centralisation in the Constitution
- Article 1: India described as “Union of States”.
- Residuary powers vested in Union (Article 248).
- Article 3: Parliament can alter State boundaries.
- Strong emergency provisions (Part XVIII). Many constitutional amendments do not require State ratification (Article 368).
- Reorganisation of States
- 2019 reorganisation of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories.
- Raised questions about:
- Extent of Parliament’s power under Article 3.
- Consent vs consultation of State Legislature.
- Fiscal Federalism Concerns
- 101st Constitutional Amendment introduced GST.
- Created GST Council (Article 279A).
- Implementation of Goods and Services Tax:
- Subsumed several State taxes.
- Increased indirect tax harmonisation.
- Vertical fiscal imbalance persists (Finance Commission reports).
- GST compensation issue during COVID period highlighted dependency concerns.
- Role of Governor
- Article 163 & 200:
- Discretionary powers.
- Power to reserve Bills for President.
- Allegations of:
- Delay in assent to State Bills.
- Political interference in State governance.
- Delimitation Debate
- Freeze on delimitation extended till 2026 (84th Constitutional Amendment).
- Post-2026 delimitation may:
- Alter Lok Sabha seat distribution.
- Impact States that achieved population control.
- Sectoral Centralisation
- 42nd Constitutional Amendment shifted education to Concurrent List.
- Expansion of Centrally Sponsored Schemes in:
- Health
- Education
- Social welfare sectors
Static Constitutional Linkages
- Article 246 – Distribution of legislative powers. Seventh Schedule – Union, State & Concurrent Lists.
- Article 249 – Parliament’s power in national interest.
- Article 356 – President’s Rule.
- Article 263 – Inter-State Council.
- Article 280 – Finance Commission.
- Basic Structure Doctrine – Federalism recognised in Kesavananda Bharati (1973).
- S.R. Bommai (1994) – Judicial limits on Article 356 misuse.
Analytical Dimensions for Mains
- Why India Adopted a Strong Centre
- Partition and national integration.
- Integration of princely States.
- Security and territorial integrity concerns.
- Centralised economic planning model post- independence.
- Concerns About Excessive Centralisation
- Reduced fiscal autonomy of States.
- Weakening of cooperative federalism. Political misuse of Governor’s office.
- Demographic imbalance in representation.
- Overuse of Concurrent List for Union expansion.
- Arguments Supporting Centralisation
- National market integration (GST). Uniform regulatory standards.
- Coordinated disaster response (e.g., pandemic).
- National security imperatives.
- Governance & Constitutional Implications Balance between:
- Cooperative federalism. Competitive federalism.
- Need to:
- Strengthen Inter-State Council.
- Reform GST Council voting dynamics.
- Clarify Governor’s discretionary powers.
- Ensure equitable delimitation formula.
- Judicial oversight remains critical to preserving federal balance.
SAFETY FIRST
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- Ethnic violence between Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities erupted on 3 May 2023 in Manipur.
- Over 250 deaths and approximately 60,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) reported (as per official and government data cited in Parliament).
- Prolonged instability led to imposition of President’s Rule under Article 356.
- New State government formed in February 2026 with attempt at ethnic representation:
- Meitei Chief Minister
- Deputy CMs from Kuki-Zo and Naga communities
- Buffer zones continue between valley and hill districts for security management.
- Emerging tensions also reported between Kuki- Zo and Naga communities, widening conflict dynamics.
Key Exam-Relevant Points
- Trigger of Conflict (2023):
- Demand for Scheduled Tribe (ST) status for Meiteis following High Court direction to consider the matter.
- Demographic-Geographic Divide:
- Valley (~10% area) houses majority population.
- Hills (~90% area) largely inhabited by Scheduled Tribes.
- Legal-Administrative Framework:
- Hill Areas Committee under Article 371C.
- Separate land protection laws restricting transfer of tribal land to non-tribals.
- Security Measures:
- Deployment of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs).
- Establishment of inter-community buffer zones.
- Governance Issues:
- Trust deficit in state machinery.
- Internally displaced population rehabilitation challenge.
- Centre–State coordination in internal disturbance situations.
Static Constitutional & Governance Linkages
- Article 355 – Duty of Union to protect States against external aggression and internal disturbance.
- Article 356 – President’s Rule.
- Article 371C – Special provisions for Manipur (Hill Areas Committee).
- Fifth Schedule – Protection of tribal interests in Scheduled Areas.
- Article 338A – National Commission for Scheduled Tribes.
- Sarkaria & Punchhi Commission – Safeguards against misuse of Article 356.
- Basic Structure Doctrine – Federalism as part of basic structure (S.R. Bommai case).
Critical Analysis
- Constitutional Dimension
- Article 356 justified only in case of breakdown of constitutional machinery.
- Judicial scrutiny mandated (S.R. Bommai judgment).
- Federal Concerns
- Frequent central intervention may weaken cooperative federalism.
- Need for balancing national security and state autonomy.
- Tribal Safeguards vs Inclusion Debate
- Grant of ST status to Meiteis may dilute existing tribal protections.
- Hill communities fear land and political marginalisation.
- Internal Security
- Ethnic segregation deepens fault lines.
- Emergence of multi-community tensions complicates peace process.
- Governance Deficit
- Prolonged displacement affects education, livelihood, and human development.
- Institutional trust erosion impacts long-term stability.
Way Forward
- Independent reconciliation commission with tribal representation.
- Time-bound rehabilitation of displaced persons (housing, livelihood, schooling).
- Transparent review mechanism for ST status demands.
- Strengthening Hill Areas Committee functioning under Article 371C.
- Confidence-building measures and phased removal of buffer zones.
- Community-led peace dialogues with civil society participation.
- Enhanced Centre–State coordination under Article 355 framework
NET FDI NEGATIVE AGAIN
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), India’s Net Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) stood at –$1.6 billion in December 2025.
- This marks the fourth consecutive month of negative net FDI.
- Although gross inward FDI remained strong at $8.6 billion, total outflows (repatriation + outward FDI) exceeded inflows.
- Investor sentiment was impacted earlier due to trade uncertainties.
- Following India–US Interim Agreement and India–EU FTA announcements, Foreign Portfolio Investments (FPI) witnessed improvement.
Key Facts
- Net FDI (Dec 2025): –$1.6 billion
- Gross Inward FDI: $8.6 billion (17.2% higher YoY)
- Repatriation/Disinvestment: ~$7.5 billion
- Outward FDI by Indian firms: $2.7 billion Major Source Countries (Inward FDI)
- Singapore
- Netherlands Mauritius
- Major Recipient Sectors
- Transport
- Manufacturing
- Computer services Electricity & energy
Static Linkages
- Balance of Payments (BoP)
- Current Account
- Trade in goods and services Remittances
- Primary income (includes profit repatriation)
- Capital Account
- FDI
- FPI
- External Commercial Borrowings (ECBs)
- NRI deposits
Outward FDI → Capital Account Repatriation of profits → Current Account
Regulatory Framework
- Governed under FEMA, 1999
- FDI policy framed by DPIIT (Ministry of Commerce & Industry)
- RBI monitors capital flows and external stability.
Why This is Important for Exam?
- Tests conceptual clarity on:
- Net vs Gross FDI
- BoP accounting
- Capital vs Current account entries
- Relevant for GS 3 answers on:
- External sector stability
- Investment climate
- Impact of trade agreements
- Important for Prelims elimination techniques.
Critical Analysis
- Positive Indicators
- Gross inflows remain strong.
- Manufacturing & infrastructure sectors attracting capital.
- Indian firms expanding globally (maturing economy).
- Trade agreements improving investor confidence.
- Concerns
- Persistent negative net FDI may:
- Increase external vulnerability. Put pressure on exchange rate.
- High repatriation suggests profit booking or uncertainty.
- Concentration of inflows from few countries.
Way Forward
- Provide tax certainty and policy stability.
- Strengthen dispute resolution mechanisms.
- Encourage reinvestment of earnings.
- Diversify FDI sources.
- Accelerate manufacturing reforms.
- Maintain macroeconomic stability (inflation control, fiscal prudence).
AI SHIFTS STATE -CAPITAL AXIS
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- Global backlash against globalisation amid:
- Rising protectionism and populism.
- US–China tech rivalry (AI, semiconductors).
- AI-driven capitalism altering state–market relations.
- India advancing:
- Semiconductor Mission
- IndiaAI Mission
- PLI schemes
- Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI).
Key Points
- Two Explanations for Backlash
- Job losses, wage stagnation, inequality.
- Weak welfare response.
- Structural Shift (AI-led Capitalism)
- AI is capital-intensive and infrastructure- heavy.
- Firms rely on chips, data centres, energy. Growing state–big tech alignment.
- Rise of techno-nationalism.
- AI and State–Capital Realignment
- Territorial embedding: Data centres, chip fabs are location-bound → weaker capital mobility.
- Industrial policy revival: US CHIPS Act, EU subsidies.
- Security focus: Control over semiconductors, rare earths, cloud.
- Surveillance risks: Convergence of governance and commercial data systems.
Static Linkages
- Article 39(b), 39(c) – Prevent concentration of wealth.
- Competition Act, 2002 – Anti-monopoly framework.
- 1991 reforms – Capital mobility.
- National security exception under WTO.
- Data governance (B.N. Srikrishna Committee).
- 2nd ARC – e-Governance and accountability.
- Economic Survey – Digital Public Infrastructure.
Critical Analysis
- Positives
- Strategic autonomy.
- Stronger domestic tech base.
- Resilient supply chains.
- High-skill employment.
- Concerns
- Big tech monopolies.
- Privacy erosion.
- Techno-authoritarianism risk.
- Rising inequality.
- Reduced democratic oversight.
- India: Opportunities & Gaps
- Leverage DPI (Aadhaar, UPI).
- Build chip ecosystem.
- R&D low (~0.7% of GDP).
- Skill and infrastructure gaps.
Way Forward
- Increase R&D to ~2% GDP.
- Strong competition enforcement.
- Effective data protection.
- AI skilling push
- Ethical AI framework.
- Balance innovation & rights. Multilateral AI cooperation.
MEDICAL AI MUST ENSURE EQUITY
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- Government of India has released a National Strategy for the use of Advanced Computational Systems (including AI) in Healthcare.
- The strategy treats digital and computational systems as part of health system architecture, not merely as clinical tools.
- It builds upon:
- Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM) National Health Authority
- AI governance frameworks of NITI Aayog Emphasis on interoperability, consent-based data exchange, equity safeguards, and continuous oversight.
Key Features
- Interoperable Digital Health Records under ABDM framework.
- Consent-based data sharing aligned with Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
- Risk-based regulatory approach (continuous monitoring, not one-time approval).
- Equity and representativeness safeguards to prevent algorithmic bias.
- Institutional oversight mechanisms within health facilities.
- Public procurement as regulatory lever for standardization and scaling.
- Integration of digital literacy in medical education.
Static Linkages
- Article 21 – Right to Life (includes right to health as per judicial interpretation).
- Article 47 – Duty of State to improve public health.
- Seventh Schedule:
- Entry 6, State List – Public Health.
- Entry 31, Union List – Communication (relevant for digital infrastructure).
- Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 – Consent-based data processing.
- WHO Ethics & Governance of AI for Health (2021) – Transparency, accountability, inclusiveness.
- Economic Survey: Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) as growth enabler.
Critical Issues
- Advantages
- Prevents regulatory vacuum.
- Promotes standardisation and interoperability.
- Addresses algorithmic bias.
- Aligns with Universal Health Coverage goals.
- Challenges
- Data fragmentation at primary healthcare level.
- Capacity gaps in States. Risk of privacy breaches.
- Urban-rural digital divide.
- Need for inter-governmental coordination.
Way Forward
- Strengthen digital health regulatory oversight.
- Periodic algorithmic audits for bias and accuracy.
- Investment in primary-level data quality.
- Federal coordination mechanisms.
- Strengthen cybersecurity frameworks.
- Ensure inclusion of vulnerable communities in datasets.
CLASSROOMS FACE AI CHALLENGES
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- At the AI Impact Summit, India reiterated its ambition to emerge as a global AI leader.
- Meanwhile, India’s education system is witnessing:
- ~2 crore enrolment in Class I (2024–25).
- 4.33 crore students in higher education (AISHE 2021–22).
- 26.5% rise in higher education enrolment since 2014–15.
- A large proportion of entrants are first- generation learners.
- However, pedagogy remains largely examination-oriented and rote-based.
- The issue: Whether India’s education system is prepared for AI-driven transformation.
Key Data & Facts
- GER in Higher Education (AISHE 2021–22): 28.4%.
- Female GER higher than male GER (AISHE). NEP 2020 recommends:
- 6% of GDP on education.
- Multidisciplinary higher education.
- Holistic, competency-based learning.
- Education in Concurrent List (42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976).
- Article 21A: Right to Education (6–14 years).
- SDG 4: Inclusive and equitable quality education.
- IndiaAI Mission: Strengthening AI ecosystem.
Static Linkages
- Human Capital Theory: Education enhances productivity and economic growth.
- Demographic Dividend: Requires skill development.
- 2nd ARC: Institutional autonomy and ethical governance.
- Foundational literacy and numeracy (FLN) as base for higher-order skills.
- Digital divide impacts inclusive growth.
Critical Analysis
- Positives
- Expansion of access to higher education.
- Increased female participation.
- Digital initiatives (DIKSHA, PM eVIDYA).
- Policy push via NEP 2020.
- Challenges
- Poor learning outcomes (ASER findings).
- Public expenditure below 6% GDP target.
- Faculty shortages and low research output.
- Rigid assessment system focused on rote learning.
- Digital inequality.
- AI may widen skill inequality.
Way Forward
- Increase public expenditure to 6% GDP.
- Shift from rote learning to competency-based assessment.
- Strengthen foundational literacy (NIPUN Bharat).
- Enhance university autonomy and research funding.
- Integrate AI literacy in school curriculum.
- Promote public-private collaboration in skill training.
- Ensure ethical AI framework aligned with constitutional values.