Don't Miss the Opportunity of becoming IAS, IPS, DC , SSP , DSP...   +918288021344   Don't Miss the Opportunity of becoming IAS, IPS, DC , SSP , DSP...   +918288021344   Don't Miss the Opportunity of becoming IAS, IPS, DC , SSP , DSP...   +918288021344  

17 June 2026

Monsoon Stalls, Deficit Grows | World Faces Trust Deficit: Modi | From War To Deal In West Asia | Iran-US Peace Deal Under Strain | Limits Of America | Primed To Treat | Mohenjo-Daro's Dancing Girl | US-Iran Truce: Wrong Question | Rethinking India's Water Future

MONSOON STALLS, DEFICIT GROWS

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • India recorded a 35% rainfall deficit by mid June 2026.
  • Southwest Monsoon advance has stalled over Maharashtra, Konkan Coast and Central India. IMD revised seasonal rainfall forecast to 90% of Long Period Average (LPA) with a 60% probability of a deficient monsoon.
  • Emergence of El Niño conditions has increased concerns regarding agriculture, food inflation and water security.
  • Centre directed States to prepare district-wise crop contingency plans and monitor vulnerable regions.

Key Facts

Rainfall Deficit – RegionRainfall Departure

  • Northwest India ———– +5%
  • East & Northeast India —— −43%
  • Central India ———— −61%
  • Southern Peninsula ——– −14%
  • All-India ——————— −35%

Government Response

  • 150–200 districts under priority monitoring.
  • Weekly review of El Niño developments.
  • Crop-wise contingency planning.
  • Promotion of cotton and pulses cultivation.
  • Adequate seed and fertilizer availability.

Reservoir Status

  • Reservoir storage (May 2026): 30.4%
  • Average storage during previous El Niño years: 25.1%

El Niño Forecast

  • NOAA: 63% probability of very strong El Niño by winter.
  • WMO: 80% probability of El Niño development during June–August.
  • IMD:
    • El Niño conditions established.
    • Ocean-atmosphere coupling confirmed.
    • No positive Indian Ocean Dipole expected.

Static Linkages

El Niño 

  • Periodic warming of the central and eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean.
  • Generally associated with:
    • Weak Indian Monsoon
    • Drought conditions
    • Agricultural stress

Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD)

  • Difference in sea surface temperatures between western and eastern Indian Ocean.
  • Positive IOD can reduce adverse impacts of El Niño.

Madden-Julian Oscillation (MJO)

  • Eastward-moving atmospheric disturbance in tropical regions.
  • Influences monsoon onset and rainfall distribution.

Long Period Average (LPA)

  • Benchmark average rainfall used by IMD.
  • Deficient rainfall: Below 90% of LPA.

Major Kharif Crops

  • Rice
  • Cotton
  • Maize
  • Soybean
  • Groundnut
  • Pulses

Critical Analysis

Opportunities

  • Higher reservoir storage compared to previous El Niño years.
  • Better preparedness through contingency planning.
  • Availability of agricultural inputs.
  • Scope for crop diversification. 

Challenges

  • Delayed sowing of Kharif crops.
  • Reduced agricultural productivity.
  • Risk of food inflation.
  • Lower groundwater recharge.
  • Stress on rainfed agriculture.
  • Adverse impact on rural incomes.

Way Forward

  • Promote drought-resistant crop varieties.
  • Expand micro-irrigation coverage.
  • Strengthen PM Fasal Bima Yojana.
  • Improve real-time weather advisories.
  • Enhance groundwater and reservoir management.
  • Encourage climate-resilient agriculture.
  • Strengthen Centre-State coordination for contingency planning

WORLD FACES TRUST DEFICIT: MODI

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • PM Narendra Modi participated in the G7 Outreach Session at Evian, France.
  • Theme: “Forging New Partnerships and Rebuilding International Solidarity”.
  • Partner countries invited: India, Brazil, Egypt, Kenya, South Korea.
  • India emphasized the need to rebuild global trust and strengthen cooperation with the Global South.
  • PM Modi held bilateral meetings with leaders of the USA, Canada, UK, and UAE.

Key Points

India’s Position

  • “Trust deficit” is a major challenge in global governance.
  • Advocated moving beyond the donor-recipient model towards equal partnerships.
  • Highlighted India’s development cooperation in:
    • Africa
    • Capacity building
    • Agriculture
    • Water management
    • Energy sector
    • Skill development

Global South

  • India reiterated its role as a voice of the Global South.
  • Emphasized partnership-based development rather than aid-based development.

Development Finance

  • India did not join the communiqué on restructuring the global development finance ecosystem.
  • Joined international initiatives on:
    • Bundibugyo Ebola outbreak response
    • Global cancer-control roadmap

India–Canada

  • Discussions on:
    • Trade
    • Technology
    • Energy security
    • FTA negotiations
  • Uranium supply agreement:
    • Canada’s Cameco and India’s Department of Atomic Energy
    • CAD 2.6 billion
    • Supply period: 2027–2035

India–UK

  • Focus on operationalising the India–UK Free Trade Agreement.
  • Strengthening trade and investment ties.

India–UAE

  • Discussion on Comprehensive Strategic Partnership.
  • Focus on:
    • Energy security
    • Indian diaspora welfare
    • Regional stability in West Asia

Prelims Facts

G7

  • Informal grouping of advanced economies.
  • Members:
    • Canada
    • France
    • Germany
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
  • European Union participates but is not counted as a member.
  • No charter, treaty, or permanent secretariat. 

Global South

  • Refers to developing and emerging economies of:
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • Latin America
    • Oceania

Bundibugyo Ebola Virus

  • Species of Ebola virus first identified in Uganda (2007).
  • Causes Ebola Virus Disease (EVD).

Mains Enrichment

Significance for India

  • Strengthens India’s role as a bridge between developed and developing nations.
  • Enhances India’s diplomatic profile in global governance.
  • Supports India’s aspiration for greater representation in international institutions.
  • Expands strategic partnerships in trade, energy, technology, and development cooperation.

Challenges

  • Persistent trust deficit in global governance.
  • Unequal representation of developing countries in global institutions.
  • Divergent interests between developed and developing economies.
  • Geopolitical rivalries affecting multilateral cooperation.

Way Forward

  • Promote inclusive and reformed multilateralism.
  • Strengthen South-South Cooperation.
  • Expand development partnerships in Africa.
  • Advocate reforms in global financial institutions.
  • Enhance cooperation in health security, climate finance, and sustainable development.

FROM WAR TO DEAL IN WEST ASIA

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context

  • The United States and Iran agreed to a ceasefire after a period of military confrontation.
  • Negotiations have begun on Iran’s nuclear programme, sanctions relief, and regional security issues.
  • The development has significant implications for West Asian stability, global energy security, and India’s strategic interests.

Key Points

U.S.–Iran Ceasefire

  • Shift from military confrontation to diplomatic engagement.
  • Focus on:
    • Nuclear negotiations.
    • Sanctions relief.
    • Regional stability.

Strait of Hormuz

  • Connects the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman.
  • One of the world’s most important maritime energy chokepoints.
  • Critical for global oil and LNG trade.

Israel–Iran Rivalry

  • Continues to be a major source of instability in West Asia.
  • Linked to Iran-backed groups:
    • Hezbollah (Lebanon)
    • Houthis (Yemen)
    • Iraqi militias

Gulf Region

  • Conflict exposed security and economic vulnerabilities.
  • Internal divisions among Gulf countries remain significant.

Major Power Competition

  • China seeks greater influence in West Asia.
  • Russia benefits from diversion of U.S. strategic attention.
  • Reflects an emerging multipolar world order.

Implications for India

  • Energy security concerns.
  • Protection of maritime trade routes.
  • Safety of Indian diaspora in Gulf countries.
  • Need for strategic autonomy and multi alignment.

Static Linkages

  • Strategic chokepoints and maritime trade.
  • Energy security and economic stability.
  • Balance of Power.
  • Strategic Autonomy.
  • Non-State Actors in international relations.
  • Regional Security Architecture.
  • Freedom of Navigation under international law.
  • Multipolarity in world politics.

Critical Analysis

Significance

  • Demonstrates limits of military solutions.
  • Highlights importance of political settlements.
  • Reduces immediate threat to global energy supplies.
  • Supports stability in maritime trade.

Challenges

  • Israel–Iran tensions remain unresolved.
  • Continued role of proxy groups.
  • Risk of future disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Absence of a comprehensive regional security framework.

India’s Concerns

  • Oil price volatility.
  • Trade disruptions.
  • Impact on remittances and diaspora welfare.
  • Expanding Chinese influence in West Asia.

Way Forward

  • Promote diplomatic conflict resolution.
  • Strengthen regional security dialogue.
  • Diversify energy import sources.
  • Expand Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR).
  • Enhance maritime security cooperation.
  • Maintain strategic autonomy and multi alignment
  • Strengthen engagement with all major West Asian stakeholders.
U.S.- IRAN ‘PEACE DEAL UNDER STRAIN
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • U.S. and Iran signed a preliminary peace memorandum to reduce tensions in West Asia.
  • Aims to revive diplomatic engagement, address the nuclear issue, and reduce regional instability.
  • Raises questions regarding Israel’s response and the future regional security architecture.

Why in News?

  • Marks a significant diplomatic breakthrough after decades of:
    • Economic sanctions.
    • Proxy conflicts.
    • Military confrontations.
    • Nuclear-related disputes.

Key Developments

U.S.–Iran Dimension

  • Revival of negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme.
  • Possibility of sanctions relief.
  • Focus on regional stability and maritime security.

Israel’s Position

  • Considers Iran a major strategic and security threat.
  • Opposed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), 2015.
  • Concerned about:
    • Expansion of Iranian regional influence.
    • Strengthening of Iran-backed groups.

Regional Trends 

  • Growing preference for de-escalation in West Asia.
  • Saudi Arabia–Iran rapprochement (2023) reflects changing regional priorities.
  • Increased emphasis on:
    • Economic development.
    • Regional connectivity.
    • Political stability.

Important Static Points

JCPOA (2015)

  • Agreement between Iran and P5+1.
    Objective:
    • Limit Iran’s nuclear activities.
    • Ensure IAEA monitoring.
    • Provide sanctions relief.

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)

  • Entered into force: 1970.
  • Iran: Signatory.
  • Israel: Not a signatory.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
  • Headquarters: Vienna, Austria.
  • Function:
    • Nuclear safeguards.
    • Verification and inspections.
    • Promotion of peaceful uses of nuclear energy.

Strategic Maritime Chokepoints

  • Strait of Hormuz.
  • Bab-el-Mandeb.
  • Suez Canal.
  • Strait of Malacca.

Significance for India

  • Ensures stability in a key energy-supplying region.
  • Supports:
    • Energy security.
    • Safety of Indian diaspora.
    • Chabahar Port development.
    • International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC).

Challenges

  • Trust deficit between U.S. and Iran.
  • Israel’s security concerns.
  • Presence of regional proxy conflicts.
  • Domestic political opposition in both countries.
  • Risk of disruption due to geopolitical tensions.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen IAEA-led verification.
  • Promote sustained diplomatic engagement.
  • Encourage regional security dialogue.
  • Enhance maritime security cooperation.
  • Support peaceful conflict resolution in West Asia.
  • Strengthen multilateral diplomacy through the UN framework

LIMITS OF AMERICA

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • The U.S. and Iran signed a preliminary Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to end hostilities and begin negotiations on a permanent settlement.
  • The agreement seeks to:
    • End military confrontation.
    • Restore maritime navigation through the Strait of Hormuz and Gulf of Oman.
    • Resume negotiations on Iran’s nuclear programme.
    • Discuss sanctions relief and release of frozen Iranian assets.
  • The development marks a shift from military confrontation to diplomatic engagement in West Asia.

Key Points

  • The MoU is a framework agreement, not a final peace treaty.
  • Future negotiations will focus on:
    • Iran’s uranium enrichment programme.
    • Nuclear inspections and verification.
    • Sanctions removal.
    • Regional security architecture.
  • The agreement highlights the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz for global energy security.
  • The episode reinforces the limitations of military solutions in resolving nuclear disputes.

Static Linkages

Strait of Hormuz:

    • Connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and Arabian Sea. 
    • One of the world’s most important maritime chokepoints.
  • Iran is a signatory to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) monitors nuclear safeguards and inspections.
  • Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), 2015:
    • Agreement between Iran and P5+1 countries.
    • Linked nuclear restrictions with sanctions relief.
  • Maritime security is governed by principles under UNCLOS.

Critical Analysis

Significance

  • Reduces the risk of a wider regional conflict.
  • Enhances global energy market stability.
  • Ensures smoother maritime trade through critical sea lanes.
  • Creates an opportunity for a diplomatic resolution of the nuclear issue.

Challenges

  • Deep strategic mistrust between the U.S. and Iran.
  • Differences over uranium enrichment limits.
  • Possibility of disruption by regional actors.
  • Sanctions-relief mechanisms remain contentious.
  • Long-term implementation and verification challenges.

Way Forward

  • Resume comprehensive nuclear negotiations under IAEA oversight.
  • Establish phased and verifiable compliance mechanisms.
  • Promote regional security dialogue involving Gulf countries.
  • Ensure uninterrupted freedom of navigation in international waters.
  • Encourage multilateral diplomacy through the United Nations.
  • Balance sanctions relief with measurable nuclear commitments. 

PRIMED TO TREAT

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Kerala reported a confirmed Nipah Virus (NiV) case in Kozhikode during the 2026 monsoon season.
  • Intensive contact tracing, isolation, and surveillance have prevented further spread.
  • WHO classifies Nipah as a Priority Pathogen due to its high fatality rate and outbreak potential.
  • Kerala has witnessed Nipah outbreaks in 2018, 2019, 2021, 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026.
  • Earlier in January 2026, two Nipah cases were reported in West Bengal and were successfully contained.

Key Points for Prelims

Nipah Virus (NiV)

  • Virus Family: Paramyxoviridae
  • Genus: Henipavirus
  • Type: Zoonotic viral disease
  • Natural Reservoir: Fruit bats (Pteropus genus/Flying Foxes)

Transmission

  • Bat → Human (contaminated fruits, palm sap, water sources)
  • Animal → Human
  • Human → Human (close contact with infected person)

Symptoms

  • Fever
  • Headache
  • Acute respiratory illness
  • Encephalitis (brain inflammation)
  • Altered consciousness/coma

Case Fatality Rate (WHO)

  • Approximately 40–75%

India: Major Outbreaks – YearLocation

  • 2001 – Siliguri, West Bengal
  • 2007 – Nadia, West Bengal
  • 2018 – Kozhikode, Kerala
  • 2019–2026 – Sporadic cases/outbreaks in Kerala

Why Kerala is Vulnerable?

  • Human encroachment into forest ecosystems.
  • High human-wildlife interaction.
  • Presence of fruit bat populations.
  • Monsoon-associated ecological conditions.

Static Linkages

  • Zoonotic diseases emerge through spillover events from animals to humans.
  • Habitat destruction and biodiversity loss increase zoonotic disease risks.
  • Public Health is a State List (List II, Seventh Schedule) subject.
  • Epidemic management requires Centre-State coordination.
  • Disease surveillance is undertaken through:
    • Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP)
    • National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC)

One Health Approach

One Health

An integrated approach recognizing the interconnection
between:

  • Human Health
  • Animal Health
  • Environmental Health

Importance

  • Early detection of zoonotic diseases.
  • Prevention of future pandemics.
  • Better coordination among health, veterinary, and environmental sectors.

Mains Enrichment

Significance of Kerala Model

  • Strong surveillance systems.
  • Rapid contact tracing.
  • Decentralized public healthcare.
  • Preparedness from previous outbreaks.
  • Effective risk communication.

Challenges

  • Recurring zoonotic spillovers.
  • Habitat fragmentation.
  • Lack of approved vaccine.
  • High mortality rate.
  • Risk to healthcare workers

MOHENJO- DARO’S DANCING GIRL

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • NCERT restored the original image of the “Dancing Girl” bronze figurine after criticism over a modified depiction in a Class IX textbook.
  • The issue revived debates on:
    • Interpretation of Harappan artifacts.
    • Colonial narratives in archaeology. 
    • India–Pakistan claims over Harappan heritage.

Key Points

Dancing Girl Figurine

  • Discovered at Mohenjo-daro in 1926.
  • Belongs to the Indus Valley Civilization (c. 2600–1900 BCE).
  • Made of bronze using the Lost-Wax (Cire Perdue) Technique.
  • Height: Approximately 10.5 cm.
  • Currently housed in National Museum, New Delhi.

India–Pakistan Heritage Dispute

  • After Partition, Harappan sites such as
  • Mohenjo-daro and Harappa became part of Pakistan.
  • India and Pakistan agreed to a 50:50 division of certain Harappan artifacts.
  • Pakistan selected the Priest King, while India retained the Dancing Girl.
  • India maintains that the Harappan Civilization is a shared civilizational heritage of South Asia, not the exclusive heritage of any one modern nation-state.

Debate on Identification

  • Archaeologist John Marshall identified the figurine as a “Dancing Girl”.
  • Later scholars questioned this interpretation.
  • No archaeological evidence conclusively proves that:
    • She was a dancer.
    • She represented a specific profession.
  • Highlights the importance of evidence-based
    archaeological interpretation.

Static Linkages

  • Indus Valley Civilization was one of the world’s earliest urban civilizations.
  • Major sites:
    • Harappa
    • Mohenjo-daro
    • Dholavira (UNESCO World Heritage Site)
    • Lothal
    • Kalibangan
    • Rakhigarhi
  • Features:
    • Urban planning
    • Grid-pattern streets
    • Advanced drainage system
    • Standardized weights and measures
    • Craft specialization
  • Bronze casting through Lost-Wax Technique continues in traditional Indian metallurgy.
  • UNESCO defines cultural heritage as a common legacy of humanity.

Critical Analysis

Significance

  • Demonstrates advanced Harappan metallurgy.
  • Provides evidence of craft specialization in urban centers.
  • Reflects challenges of interpreting archaeological evidence.

Concerns

  • Colonial interpretations often became accepted historical facts.
  • Present-day moral standards may distort understanding of ancient societies.
  • Heritage ownership disputes may affect cultural diplomacy.

UPSC Angle

  • Shared heritage versus territorial ownership.
  • Archaeological evidence as a source of ancient history.
  • Decolonisation of historical narratives.

Way Forward

  • Promote evidence-based archaeological research.
  • Encourage regional cooperation on shared heritage.
  • Strengthen conservation and digital archiving of artifacts.
  • Ensure accurate representation of archaeological findings in educational material.
  • Develop objective and multidisciplinary approaches to ancient history.

U.S.- IRAN TRUCE: WRONG QUESTION

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context

  • The recent Iran–US ceasefire framework followed a period of military confrontation involving Iran, the United States and Israel.
  • The agreement is viewed as a temporary ceasefire arrangement, not a comprehensive peace settlement.
  • The conflict highlighted concerns regarding:
    • Sovereignty and territorial integrity.
    • Use of force in international relations.
    • Political assassinations and targeted
      strikes.
    • Growing use of drones and proxy warfare.
    • Weakening of international law and
      multilateral institutions.
  • The developments have implications for India’s strategic autonomy, energy security and foreign policy.

Key Points

  • Ceasefire postpones rather than resolves core disputes between Iran and the US.
  • Regional mediators such as Qatar and Oman played important diplomatic roles.
  • Conflict exposed vulnerabilities in:
    • Global energy supply chains.
    • Maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz.
    • Rules-based international order.
  • Increasing use of:
    • Drones.
    • Proxy groups.
    • Precision-targeted military operations.
  • Raises concerns about normalization of:
    • Political assassinations.
    • Pre-emptive military strikes.
    • Unilateral use of force.
  • India adopted a cautious approach balancing ties with:
    • Iran.
    • Israel.
    • United States.
    • Gulf countries.

Static Linkages

  • Article 2(4), UN Charter prohibits use of force against territorial integrity or political independence of states.
  • Article 51, UN Charter recognizes the inherent right of self-defence.
  • Chapter VI, UN Charter provides for peaceful settlement of disputes.
  • Sovereignty and non-intervention are fundamental principles of international law.
  • Strait of Hormuz is a critical global oil transit chokepoint.
  • Strategic Autonomy is a key pillar of India’s foreign policy.
  • Balance of Power remains an important concept in international relations.

Critical Analysis

Significance

  • Prevents immediate escalation in West Asia.
  • Reduces risks to global energy markets.
  • Opens space for diplomatic engagement.
  • Demonstrates importance of mediation and dialogue.

Concerns

  • Does not address underlying geopolitical rivalries.
  • Proxy conflicts may continue.
  • Weakens norms against use of force.
  • Increasing drone warfare creates new security challenges.
  • Erosion of sovereignty and international law.
  • Growing fragmentation of the rules-based order.

Implications for India

  • Energy security concerns due to dependence on West Asian oil.
  • Safety of Indian diaspora in the region.
  • Need to secure maritime trade routes.
  • Importance of maintaining strategic autonomy.
  • Greater role in supporting a stable multipolar order.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen commitment to international law and UN Charter principles.
  • Promote dialogue-based conflict resolution.
  • Support freedom of navigation and maritime security.
  • Develop international norms on drone warfare.
  • Enhance India’s role in multilateral diplomacy.
  • Diversify energy sources and strategic reserves. 
  • Advocate reform and strengthening of global governance institutions.

RETHINKING INDIA’S WATER FUTURE

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Heatwave conditions have intensified water scarcity across Indian cities.
  • Major urban centres such as Delhi, Mumbai, Bengaluru and Chennai are facing severe water stress.
  • The crisis reflects structural deficiencies in urban water management rather than climate change alone.
  • The 2018 Composite Water Management Index (CWMI) by NITI Aayog warned about unsustainable water use in Indian cities.
  • Dynamic Groundwater Resources Assessment reports continued groundwater over exploitation.

Key Points

Causes

  • Excessive groundwater extraction.
  • Rapid urbanization and rising demand.
  • Leakages in distribution networks.
  • Poor wastewater treatment and reuse.
  • Inadequate rainwater harvesting.
  • Encroachment of lakes, wetlands, and drainage channels.
  • Climate variability and heatwaves.

Important Reports

    • Composite Water Management Index (CWMI), 2018Assessed water resource management performance of States.
    • Highlighted urban water stress.
    • Dynamic Groundwater Resources AssessmentConducted by Ministry of Jal Shakti.
    • Evaluates groundwater recharge and extraction levels.

Government Initiatives

  • Atal Bhujal Yojana.
  • Jal Jeevan Mission.
  • AMRUT.
  • Catch the Rain Campaign.

International Best Practice

    • China’s Sponge City ModelPermeable pavements.
    • Urban wetlands.
    • Green infrastructure.
    • Rainwater retention and groundwater recharge.

Static Linkages

  • Entry 17, State List – Water.
  • Entry 56, Union List – Inter-State rivers.
  • Article 21 – Right to clean water (Judicial interpretation).
  • Aquifer.
  • Groundwater recharge.
  • Watershed management.
  • Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM).
  • Wetland ecosystem services.

Critical Analysis

Concerns

  • Urban water demand exceeds sustainable supply.
  • Groundwater extraction surpasses recharge rates.
  • Weak municipal governance.
  • Fragmented institutional framework.
  • Loss of urban wetlands and lakes.
  • Low wastewater recycling rates. 

Significance

  • Water security is essential for economic growth.
  • Sustainable cities require resilient water systems.
  • Nature-based solutions can reduce both floods and droughts.
  • Demand-side management is becoming critical.

Way Forward

  • Shift towards demand-side water management.
  • Universal water metering.
  • Promote wastewater recycling and reuse.
  • Scale up rainwater harvesting.
  • Restore urban lakes and wetlands.
  • Prepare city-level water budgets.
  • Strengthen groundwater governance.
  • Adopt Sponge City-type urban planning.
  • Improve municipal capacity and accountability