New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344   New Batch Starting Soon . . .   Chandigarh Centre: 8288021344

13 January 2026

Inflation At 3-Month High | PSLV-C62 Launch Fail | India-Germany Defence Pact | Rajasthan Panchayat Goes Fully Organic | Early Investment In Children Pays | New Bill On Higher Education | Troubling Repeat | Why Article 6 empowers India

INFLATION AT 3-MONTH HIGH

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • India’s retail inflation (CPI) rose to a three- month high of 1.33% in December 2025, according to MoSPI data.
  • Inflation remains well below RBI’s lower tolerance level of 2%, under the flexible inflation targeting framework.
  • The decline in inflation is broad-based, with major contribution from food price deflation due to a high base effect.
  • Despite headline moderation, core inflation rose to a 28-month high, driven mainly by precious metals prices.

Key Points

  • CPI Inflation (Dec 2025): 1.33% (Nov 2025: lower)
  • RBI Inflation Target: 4% ± 2% (2%–6%)  Food & Beverages Inflation:
    • Contracted by –1.85% (Nov: –2.8%)
    • Base effect: 7.7% inflation in Dec 2024  
  • Items with High Inflation (>5%):
    • Meat products  
    • Edible oils
    • Fruits
  • Fuel & Light Inflation: 1.97% (down from 2.3%)  Housing Inflation: 2.86% (marginal easing)
  • Clothing & Footwear: 1.44% (Dec 2024: 2.7%)  Pan, Tobacco & Intoxicants: unchanged at 2.96%
  • Core CPI Inflation:
    •  4.8% (28-month high)
    • Excluding gold & silver: 2.4% (unchanged)

Static Linkages

  • CPI is compiled by National Statistical Office (NSO) under MoSPI
  • RBI follows Flexible Inflation Targeting (FIT) framework (recommended by Urjit Patel Committee, 2014)
  • Inflation mandate inserted through RBI Act, 1934 (Amendment, 2016)
  • CPI components and weights derived from Consumer Expenditure Survey
  • Core inflation excludes volatile components such as food and fuel
  • Monetary policy decisions taken by Monetary Policy Committee (MPC)

Critical Analysis

  • Positive Aspects
    • Sustained low inflation improves real household purchasing power
    • Provides policy space for accommodative monetary stance
    • Food price stability supports consumption-led growth
  • Concerns
    • Core inflation spike indicates latent demand- side pressures
    • Rising prices of proteins and edible oils affect nutrition security
    • Precious metals-led inflation may reflect global uncertainty and capital flight
    • Very low inflation risks demand compression if prolonged
  • Stakeholder Perspective
    • RBI: Cautious due to rising core inflation
    • Consumers: Benefit from low food inflation  
    • Producers/Farmers: Risk of lower price realization
    • Government: Fiscal-monetary coordination challenge

Way Forward

  • Maintain data-dependent monetary policy approach
  • Monitor core inflation excluding precious metals closely
  • Strengthen agricultural supply chains to avoid future food inflation
  • Use buffer stocks and import policy for edible oils and pulses
  • Improve price transmission mechanisms at retail level

PSLV-C62 LAUNCH FAIL

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)’s PSLV-C62 mission failed due to an anomaly during the third stage (PS3).
  • Launch occurred from Satish Dhawan Space Centre.
  • Loss of EOS-N1 Earth Observation satellite and 15 co-passenger satellites.
  • Second consecutive PSLV failure after PSLV- C61 (May 2025).
  • Mission was commercially executed by NewSpace India Limited (NSIL).
  • EOS-N1 developed for strategic purposes by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).

Key Points

  • PSLV: Four-stage launch vehicle (PS1 & PS3 – solid; PS2 & PS4 – liquid).
  • Anomaly: disturbance in vehicle roll rates near end of PS3 → trajectory deviation.
  • Intended orbit: Sun Synchronous Orbit (SSO).
  • Planned PS4 restart and KID capsule re-entry could not be achieved.
  • Financial aspects:
    • Strategic satellites: loss borne by Government of India (generally uninsured).
    • Private satellites: covered via launch insurance (if purchased).
  • Waiver of liability standard in space launch contracts; launcher not liable unless gross negligence proven.

Static Linkages

  • Sun Synchronous Orbit: Near-polar orbit; constant local solar time → ideal for remote sensing.
  • Outer Space Treaty, 1967: State responsibility and liability for national space activities.
  • Space sector reforms (2020):
    • NSIL for commercialisation.
    • IN-SPACe for private sector facilitation.
  • Importance of launch vehicle reliability for India’s share in global small-satellite launch market.

Critical Analysis

  • Issues
    • Back-to-back PSLV failures affect commercial credibility.
    • Financial burden on state for strategic payload losses.
    • Highlights need for stronger quality assurance and mission assurance systems.
  • Significance
    • Failure analysis essential for long-term reliability.
    • Tests robustness of India’s commercial space reforms.

Way Forward

  • Strengthen third-stage testing and redundancy checks.
  • Independent mission assurance audits for commercial launches.
  • Reduce over-dependence on PSLV by operationalising SSLV and LVM3.
  • Continuous lessons-learnt integration across ISRO missions.

INDIA- GERMANY DEFENCE PACT

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News 
  • India and Germany signed an agreement on bilateral defence industrial cooperation
  • Focus on co-production and co-development in defence sector.
  • Visit of Friedrich Merz to India.
  • India–Germany mark 25 years of Strategic Partnership and 75 years of diplomatic relations.
  • Announcement of a new consultation mechanism on Indo-Pacific cooperation.
  • Joint support reiterated for early conclusion of India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA).

Key Points

  • Agreement titled: “Strengthening Bilateral Defence Industrial Cooperation”.
  • Areas covered:
    • Defence manufacturing collaboration
    • Simplified defence trade procedures
    • Roadmap for defence industry partnership  
  • Emphasis on:
    • Mutual trust
    • Long-term technology collaboration
    • Additional MoUs / Joint Declarations:
    • Skilled workforce mobility (Indian professionals to Germany)
    • Higher education and research
    • Sports cooperation
  • Germany flagged rise in global protectionism affecting trade.
  • Talks included regional/global issues:  Ukraine conflict
    • Gaza crisis
    • Terrorism (India reiterated condemnation)

Static Linkages

  • Defence indigenisation under Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative.
  • Defence manufacturing governed by Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP).
  • FDI in defence: up to 74% under automatic route.
  • Indo-Pacific vision aligned with SAGAR framework.
  • India–EU FTA aims to boost trade, investment, and supply chains.
  • Strategic partnerships as part of India’s multi- alignment foreign policy.

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Supports domestic defence manufacturing.
    • Diversifies defence partnerships beyond traditional suppliers.
    • Enhances India’s role in Indo-Pacific security architecture.
    • Addresses skilled labour shortages in partner country.
  • Challenges
    • Technology transfer subject to export controls.  
    • Long timelines in co-development projects.
    • Protectionist trends may affect trade benefits.  
    • India–EU FTA faces regulatory and standards-  related hurdles.

Way Forward

  • Operationalise defence cooperation through time-bound roadmaps.
  • Encourage private sector and MSME participation.
  • Align defence collaboration with Make in India and iDEX.
  • Fast-track India–EU FTA negotiations with balanced safeguards.
  • Institutionalise Indo-Pacific consultations.
RAJASTHAN PANCHAYAT GOES FULLY ORGANIC
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
  • Bamanwas Kankar in Kotputli-Behror became the first fully organic panchayat in Rajasthan.
  • All agricultural and animal husbandry practices are chemical-free.
  • Transition supported by Cofarmin Federation of Organic Societies and Producer Companies (COFED).
  • Community pledge against chemical-based farming taken on January 2.

Key Points

  • Reasons for transition: Soil degradation, falling groundwater, rising input costs, health issues from agro-chemicals.
  • Practices adopted:
    • No chemical pesticides or synthetic fertilisers.
    • Organic livestock management ensuring animal health and safe dairy.
  • Outcomes:
    • Improved soil fertility and biodiversity.
    • Reduced cost of cultivation.
    • Access to premium organic markets.
  • Future plan: COFED targets 300 fully organic panchayats across Rajasthan districts.

Static Linkages

  • Organic farming: FAO-defined holistic system improving agro-ecosystem health.
  • Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana (PKVY): Cluster-based organic farming with PGS certification.
  • National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA): Soil health, water efficiency, climate resilience.
  • Soil Health Card Scheme: Long-term relevance through reduced chemical dependency.
  • Sustainable Development Goals: SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption).

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Environment-friendly and climate-resilient agriculture.
    • Improved public health and food safety.
    • Strengthens community participation and local governance.
  • Challenges
    • Short-term yield uncertainty during transition.  
    • Certification and market linkage issues.
    • Need for continuous extension support.

Way Forward

  • Promote PGS certification and Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs).
  • Provide transition incentives and crop insurance support.
  • Strengthen KVKs for organic farming extension.
  • Replicate model via Gram PanchayatDevelopment Plans (GPDPs).

EARLY INVESTMENT IN CHILDREN PAYS

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • India aims to become a Viksit Bharat and a $30 trillion economy by 2047.
  • Human capital formation is critical to sustain long-term economic growth.
  • Despite focus on infrastructure, manufacturing and digital economy, systematic investment in Early Childhood Care and Development (ECCD) remains inadequate.
  • World Health Organization and UNICEF recognise the first 1,000 days as a decisive window for child development.

Key Points

  • First 3,000 days (conception to 8 years) determine physical growth, brain development, cognition, emotional and social skills.
  • 80–85% of brain development occurs in early childhood.
  • ECCD is a high-return economic investment, not merely a welfare measure.
  • Well-nourished and stimulated children show better educational attainment, productivity and earnings in adulthood.
  • ECCD reduces future public spending on healthcare, remedial education and social protection.
  • Developmental risks exist across all income groups, not only among the poor.

Static Linkages

  • Human Capital Theory: Early investment improves labour productivity and growth.
  • Demographic Dividend: Quality of population is as important as quantity.
  • Directive Principles of State Policy:
  • Article 39(f): Protection of childhood and youth
  • Article 47: Improvement of nutrition and public health
  • Sustainable Development Goals: SDG-2 (Zero Hunger), SDG-3 (Health), SDG-4 (Education).

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Strong scientific and economic evidence supporting early intervention.
    • Long-term, intergenerational benefits for growth and equity.
  • Concerns
    • Fragmented approach across ministries and schemes.
    • Excess focus on child survival, limited focus on holistic development.
    • Lack of structured pre-conception and parental education systems.
    • Inadequate attention to early stimulation and emotional well-being.

Way Forward

  • Universal pre-conception and premarital counselling on nutrition and health.
  • Structured parental education on early stimulation and caregiving.
  • Early identification of developmental delays through growth monitoring.
  • Strengthen quality of care for 2–5 years age group.
  • Integrate health, nutrition and education into a life-cycle ECCD framework.
  • Launch a national ECCD mission with inter- ministerial coordination.
  • Promote citizen-led and community-based participation in child development.
NEW BILL ON HIGHER EDUCATION

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • Introduced in Lok Sabha on 15 December 2025.
  • Legislative follow-up to NEP 2020 for restructuring higher education regulation.
  • Aims to support Viksit Bharat @2047 through quality, autonomy, and accountability in higher education.
  • Philosophical grounding aligns with ideas of social relevance in education articulated by Tiruvalluvar.

Key Points

  • Establishes Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan (VBSA) as an apex umbrella body.
  • Creates three separate verticals:
    • Regulation
    • Accreditation
    • Academic Standards
  • Seeks to replace fragmented regulators by repealing:
    • UGC Act, 1956
    • AICTE Act, 1987
    • NCTE Act, 1993
  • Constitutional basis: Entry 66, Union List (Seventh Schedule).
  • Introduces technology-enabled single-window system.
  • Relies on public self-disclosure for governance, finance, faculty, infrastructure, outcomes.
  • Promotes graded autonomy for well- performing institutions.
  • Institutionalises student feedback and grievance redressal.
  • Focus on outcome-based regulation (“light but tight”).

Static Linkages

  • Education: Concurrent List (42nd Constitutional Amendment).
  • Union’s role in coordination and determination of standards in higher education.
  • Concepts of autonomy with accountability.
  • Principles of good governance: transparency, efficiency, reduced discretion.
  • Ethical foundations of education and nation-building.

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Reduces regulatory overlap and compliance burden.
    • Enhances institutional autonomy without diluting standards.
    • Encourages innovation, interdisciplinarity, and flexibility.
    • Improves global credibility and academic mobility.
    • Strengthens student-centric governance.
  • Concerns
    • Risk of over-centralisation affecting federal balance.
    • Transition challenges from existing regulatory bodies.
    • Capacity gaps in digital and audit mechanisms.
    • Possible inequity for smaller or rural institutions.

Way Forward

  • Ensure cooperative federalism with State participation.
  • Phased implementation with institutional capacity building.
  • Independent and robust audit of self- disclosure data.
  • Safeguards for diversity, inclusion, and regional equity.
  • Periodic review aligned with NEP 2020 outcomes.

TROUBLING REPEAT

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Context of the News

  • On 12 January 2026, PSLV-C62 mission of Indian Space Research Organisation failed due to an anomaly in the third stage (PS3).
  • Failure pattern similar to PSLV-C61 (May 2025), which also failed during PS3 operation.
  • PSLV is considered ISRO’s most reliable launch vehicle, with over two decades of service.
  • Failure Analysis Committee (FAC) report of C61 was not released publicly.
  • PSLV is being commercially marketed by NewSpace India Limited.

Key Points

  • Technical aspect
    • PS3 is a solid rocket motor → pressure drop/roll disturbance indicates structural or nozzle failure.
    • Repetition of anomaly suggests systemic Quality Assurance (QA) issue, not random failure.
  • Institutional aspect
  • Clearing PSLV for flight without public disclosure of FAC findings raised governance concerns.
  • Commercial aspect
    • Consecutive failures affect global credibility of PSLV.
    • Likely rise in insurance premiums, reducing competitiveness in small-satellite launch market.
  • Strategic aspect
    • C62 carried EOS-N1, reportedly linked to strategic applications (associated with Defence Research and Development Organisation).
  • Leadership context
    • Current ISRO leadership under V.
    • Narayanan marked by high launch cadence and reduced transparency.
  • Contrast
    • ISRO’s LVM-3 has shown improving reliability (e.g., M6 mission, Dec 2025).

Static Linkages

  • Solid propulsion systems require stable chamber pressure for thrust symmetry (NCERT Physics).
  • Public institutions funded by taxpayers must ensure accountability and transparency (ARC governance reforms).
  • Commercialisation of space activities aims to separate R&D and operations (Department of Space reforms).
  • Risk assessment in launch insurance is based on historical failure data (Economic Survey – space economy).

Critical Analysis

  • Positives
    • Demonstrates ambition to maintain high launch frequency.
    • Reliability of LVM-3 indicates technical capability remains strong.
  • Negatives / Concerns
    • Lack of transparency weakens scientific credibility.
    • Repeated PS3 failure points to manufacturing/QA lapses.
    • Commercial trust erosion due to higher insurance costs.
    • Possible strategic urgency overriding safety caution.

Way Forward

  • Publish FAC report of PSLV-C61 with necessary redactions.
  • Conduct independent QA and supply-chain audit of PSLV.
  • Temporary grounding of PSLV until corrective validation.
  • Institutionalise a failure disclosure protocol.
  • Balance strategic urgency with mission assurance.
  • Diversify commercial launch portfolio beyond PSLV.

WHY ARTICLE 6 EMPOWERS INDIA

KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context/ Background
  • Article 6 of the Paris Agreement operationalised fully at COP29 to strengthen global carbon market
  • Article 6.4 mechanism adopted, replacing the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).
  • 89 cooperation arrangements under Article 6.2 across 58 Parties (A6 Implementation Partnership).
  • India signed Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) with Japan (Aug 2025), operationalising Article 6.2 for India.
  • India identified 13 priority activities for Article 6 cooperation.

Key Provisions of Article 6

  • Article 6.2
    • Bilateral / plurilateral cooperation.
    • Transfer of Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs).
    • Requires corresponding adjustments to avoid double counting.
  • Article 6.4
    • UN-supervised global carbon crediting mechanism.
    • Successor to CDM.  
    • Stricter norms on:
      • Additionality
      • Environmental integrity
      • Transparency
      • Sustainable development benefits

Significance for India

  • Enables access to advanced low-carbon technologies.
  • Channels international climate finance into priority sectors.
  • Supports industrial decarbonisation while sustaining economic growth.
  • Strengthens bilateral climate diplomacy (e.g., India–Japan JCM).
  • Enhances India’s competitiveness in a carbon- constrained global trade regime.

India’s Identified Priority Sectors

  • Renewable energy with energy storage  Offshore wind and solar thermal power  Green hydrogen
  • Compressed Bio-Gas (CBG)  Fuel-cell-based mobility
  • Advanced energy-efficiency technologies  Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
  • Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) in hard-to-abate sectors

Static Linkages

  • UNFCCC → Kyoto Protocol → Paris Agreement transition
  • Limitations of CDM (uneven distribution, weak additionality)
  • Concept of carbon markets and emissions trading
  • Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR)
  • Role of technology transfer in sustainable development
  • Importance of decarbonising hard-to-abate sectors

Implementation Challenges

  • Absence of detailed domestic rules for Article 6 implementation.
  • Delay in:
    • Letters of Authorisation
    • Corresponding adjustment procedures  
  • Long project approval timelines (AFOLU projects ~1600 days in India).
  • High transaction and compliance costs.
  • Risk of environmental integrity dilution if governance is weak.

Policy Gaps Identified

  • Designated National Authority exists, but scope and procedures unclear.
  • No single-window clearance for A6 projects.
  • Weak domestic ecosystem for carbon removal technologies.
  • Limited institutional capacity for MRV (Measurement, Reporting, Verification).

Way Forward

  • Notify comprehensive Article 6 operational guidelines.
  • Establish single-window clearance mechanism for carbon projects.
  • Set up Cabinet-level steering committee for coordination.
  • Develop domestic carbon removals market (biochar, enhanced rock weathering).
  • Strengthen MRV systems and digital registries.
  • Lead South–South cooperation on carbon markets and climate finance.