Inflation At 3-Month High | PSLV-C62 Launch Fail | India-Germany Defence Pact | Rajasthan Panchayat Goes Fully Organic | Early Investment In Children Pays | New Bill On Higher Education | Troubling Repeat | Why Article 6 empowers India
INFLATION AT 3-MONTH HIGH- India’s retail inflation (CPI) rose to a three- month high of 1.33% in December 2025, according to MoSPI data.
- Inflation remains well below RBI’s lower tolerance level of 2%, under the flexible inflation targeting framework.
- The decline in inflation is broad-based, with major contribution from food price deflation due to a high base effect.
- Despite headline moderation, core inflation rose to a 28-month high, driven mainly by precious metals prices.
Key Points
- CPI Inflation (Dec 2025): 1.33% (Nov 2025: lower)
- RBI Inflation Target: 4% ± 2% (2%–6%) Food & Beverages Inflation:
- Contracted by –1.85% (Nov: –2.8%)
- Base effect: 7.7% inflation in Dec 2024
- Items with High Inflation (>5%):
- Meat products
- Edible oils
- Fruits
- Fuel & Light Inflation: 1.97% (down from 2.3%) Housing Inflation: 2.86% (marginal easing)
- Clothing & Footwear: 1.44% (Dec 2024: 2.7%) Pan, Tobacco & Intoxicants: unchanged at 2.96%
- Core CPI Inflation:
- 4.8% (28-month high)
- Excluding gold & silver: 2.4% (unchanged)
Static Linkages
- CPI is compiled by National Statistical Office (NSO) under MoSPI
- RBI follows Flexible Inflation Targeting (FIT) framework (recommended by Urjit Patel Committee, 2014)
- Inflation mandate inserted through RBI Act, 1934 (Amendment, 2016)
- CPI components and weights derived from Consumer Expenditure Survey
- Core inflation excludes volatile components such as food and fuel
- Monetary policy decisions taken by Monetary Policy Committee (MPC)
Critical Analysis
- Positive Aspects
- Sustained low inflation improves real household purchasing power
- Provides policy space for accommodative monetary stance
- Food price stability supports consumption-led growth
- Concerns
- Core inflation spike indicates latent demand- side pressures
- Rising prices of proteins and edible oils affect nutrition security
- Precious metals-led inflation may reflect global uncertainty and capital flight
- Very low inflation risks demand compression if prolonged
- Stakeholder Perspective
- RBI: Cautious due to rising core inflation
- Consumers: Benefit from low food inflation
- Producers/Farmers: Risk of lower price realization
- Government: Fiscal-monetary coordination challenge
Way Forward
- Maintain data-dependent monetary policy approach
- Monitor core inflation excluding precious metals closely
- Strengthen agricultural supply chains to avoid future food inflation
- Use buffer stocks and import policy for edible oils and pulses
- Improve price transmission mechanisms at retail level
PSLV-C62 LAUNCH FAIL
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)’s PSLV-C62 mission failed due to an anomaly during the third stage (PS3).
- Launch occurred from Satish Dhawan Space Centre.
- Loss of EOS-N1 Earth Observation satellite and 15 co-passenger satellites.
- Second consecutive PSLV failure after PSLV- C61 (May 2025).
- Mission was commercially executed by NewSpace India Limited (NSIL).
- EOS-N1 developed for strategic purposes by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO).
Key Points
- PSLV: Four-stage launch vehicle (PS1 & PS3 – solid; PS2 & PS4 – liquid).
- Anomaly: disturbance in vehicle roll rates near end of PS3 → trajectory deviation.
- Intended orbit: Sun Synchronous Orbit (SSO).
- Planned PS4 restart and KID capsule re-entry could not be achieved.
- Financial aspects:
- Strategic satellites: loss borne by Government of India (generally uninsured).
- Private satellites: covered via launch insurance (if purchased).
- Waiver of liability standard in space launch contracts; launcher not liable unless gross negligence proven.
Static Linkages
- Sun Synchronous Orbit: Near-polar orbit; constant local solar time → ideal for remote sensing.
- Outer Space Treaty, 1967: State responsibility and liability for national space activities.
- Space sector reforms (2020):
- NSIL for commercialisation.
- IN-SPACe for private sector facilitation.
- Importance of launch vehicle reliability for India’s share in global small-satellite launch market.
Critical Analysis
- Issues
- Back-to-back PSLV failures affect commercial credibility.
- Financial burden on state for strategic payload losses.
- Highlights need for stronger quality assurance and mission assurance systems.
- Significance
- Failure analysis essential for long-term reliability.
- Tests robustness of India’s commercial space reforms.
Way Forward
- Strengthen third-stage testing and redundancy checks.
- Independent mission assurance audits for commercial launches.
- Reduce over-dependence on PSLV by operationalising SSLV and LVM3.
- Continuous lessons-learnt integration across ISRO missions.
INDIA- GERMANY DEFENCE PACT
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
- India and Germany signed an agreement on bilateral defence industrial cooperation
- Focus on co-production and co-development in defence sector.
- Visit of Friedrich Merz to India.
- India–Germany mark 25 years of Strategic Partnership and 75 years of diplomatic relations.
- Announcement of a new consultation mechanism on Indo-Pacific cooperation.
- Joint support reiterated for early conclusion of India–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
Key Points
- Agreement titled: “Strengthening Bilateral Defence Industrial Cooperation”.
- Areas covered:
- Defence manufacturing collaboration
- Simplified defence trade procedures
- Roadmap for defence industry partnership
- Emphasis on:
- Mutual trust
- Long-term technology collaboration
- Additional MoUs / Joint Declarations:
- Skilled workforce mobility (Indian professionals to Germany)
- Higher education and research
- Sports cooperation
- Germany flagged rise in global protectionism affecting trade.
- Talks included regional/global issues: Ukraine conflict
- Gaza crisis
- Terrorism (India reiterated condemnation)
Static Linkages
- Defence indigenisation under Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative.
- Defence manufacturing governed by Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP).
- FDI in defence: up to 74% under automatic route.
- Indo-Pacific vision aligned with SAGAR framework.
- India–EU FTA aims to boost trade, investment, and supply chains.
- Strategic partnerships as part of India’s multi- alignment foreign policy.
Critical Analysis
- Positives
- Supports domestic defence manufacturing.
- Diversifies defence partnerships beyond traditional suppliers.
- Enhances India’s role in Indo-Pacific security architecture.
- Addresses skilled labour shortages in partner country.
- Challenges
- Technology transfer subject to export controls.
- Long timelines in co-development projects.
- Protectionist trends may affect trade benefits.
- India–EU FTA faces regulatory and standards- related hurdles.
Way Forward
- Operationalise defence cooperation through time-bound roadmaps.
- Encourage private sector and MSME participation.
- Align defence collaboration with Make in India and iDEX.
- Fast-track India–EU FTA negotiations with balanced safeguards.
- Institutionalise Indo-Pacific consultations.
RAJASTHAN PANCHAYAT GOES FULLY ORGANIC
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
- Bamanwas Kankar in Kotputli-Behror became the first fully organic panchayat in Rajasthan.
- All agricultural and animal husbandry practices are chemical-free.
- Transition supported by Cofarmin Federation of Organic Societies and Producer Companies (COFED).
- Community pledge against chemical-based farming taken on January 2.
Key Points
- Reasons for transition: Soil degradation, falling groundwater, rising input costs, health issues from agro-chemicals.
- Practices adopted:
- No chemical pesticides or synthetic fertilisers.
- Organic livestock management ensuring animal health and safe dairy.
- Outcomes:
- Improved soil fertility and biodiversity.
- Reduced cost of cultivation.
- Access to premium organic markets.
- Future plan: COFED targets 300 fully organic panchayats across Rajasthan districts.
Static Linkages
- Organic farming: FAO-defined holistic system improving agro-ecosystem health.
- Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana (PKVY): Cluster-based organic farming with PGS certification.
- National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA): Soil health, water efficiency, climate resilience.
- Soil Health Card Scheme: Long-term relevance through reduced chemical dependency.
- Sustainable Development Goals: SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption).
Critical Analysis
- Positives
- Environment-friendly and climate-resilient agriculture.
- Improved public health and food safety.
- Strengthens community participation and local governance.
- Challenges
- Short-term yield uncertainty during transition.
- Certification and market linkage issues.
- Need for continuous extension support.
Way Forward
- Promote PGS certification and Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs).
- Provide transition incentives and crop insurance support.
- Strengthen KVKs for organic farming extension.
- Replicate model via Gram PanchayatDevelopment Plans (GPDPs).
EARLY INVESTMENT IN CHILDREN PAYS
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context of the News
- India aims to become a Viksit Bharat and a $30 trillion economy by 2047.
- Human capital formation is critical to sustain long-term economic growth.
- Despite focus on infrastructure, manufacturing and digital economy, systematic investment in Early Childhood Care and Development (ECCD) remains inadequate.
- World Health Organization and UNICEF recognise the first 1,000 days as a decisive window for child development.
Key Points
- First 3,000 days (conception to 8 years) determine physical growth, brain development, cognition, emotional and social skills.
- 80–85% of brain development occurs in early childhood.
- ECCD is a high-return economic investment, not merely a welfare measure.
- Well-nourished and stimulated children show better educational attainment, productivity and earnings in adulthood.
- ECCD reduces future public spending on healthcare, remedial education and social protection.
- Developmental risks exist across all income groups, not only among the poor.
Static Linkages
- Human Capital Theory: Early investment improves labour productivity and growth.
- Demographic Dividend: Quality of population is as important as quantity.
- Directive Principles of State Policy:
- Article 39(f): Protection of childhood and youth
- Article 47: Improvement of nutrition and public health
- Sustainable Development Goals: SDG-2 (Zero Hunger), SDG-3 (Health), SDG-4 (Education).
Critical Analysis
- Positives
- Strong scientific and economic evidence supporting early intervention.
- Long-term, intergenerational benefits for growth and equity.
- Concerns
- Fragmented approach across ministries and schemes.
- Excess focus on child survival, limited focus on holistic development.
- Lack of structured pre-conception and parental education systems.
- Inadequate attention to early stimulation and emotional well-being.
Way Forward
- Universal pre-conception and premarital counselling on nutrition and health.
- Structured parental education on early stimulation and caregiving.
- Early identification of developmental delays through growth monitoring.
- Strengthen quality of care for 2–5 years age group.
- Integrate health, nutrition and education into a life-cycle ECCD framework.
- Launch a national ECCD mission with inter- ministerial coordination.
- Promote citizen-led and community-based participation in child development.
NEW BILL ON HIGHER EDUCATION- Introduced in Lok Sabha on 15 December 2025.
- Legislative follow-up to NEP 2020 for restructuring higher education regulation.
- Aims to support Viksit Bharat @2047 through quality, autonomy, and accountability in higher education.
- Philosophical grounding aligns with ideas of social relevance in education articulated by Tiruvalluvar.
Key Points
- Establishes Viksit Bharat Shiksha Adhishthan (VBSA) as an apex umbrella body.
- Creates three separate verticals:
- Regulation
- Accreditation
- Academic Standards
- Seeks to replace fragmented regulators by repealing:
- UGC Act, 1956
- AICTE Act, 1987
- NCTE Act, 1993
- Constitutional basis: Entry 66, Union List (Seventh Schedule).
- Introduces technology-enabled single-window system.
- Relies on public self-disclosure for governance, finance, faculty, infrastructure, outcomes.
- Promotes graded autonomy for well- performing institutions.
- Institutionalises student feedback and grievance redressal.
- Focus on outcome-based regulation (“light but tight”).
Static Linkages
- Education: Concurrent List (42nd Constitutional Amendment).
- Union’s role in coordination and determination of standards in higher education.
- Concepts of autonomy with accountability.
- Principles of good governance: transparency, efficiency, reduced discretion.
- Ethical foundations of education and nation-building.
Critical Analysis
- Positives
- Reduces regulatory overlap and compliance burden.
- Enhances institutional autonomy without diluting standards.
- Encourages innovation, interdisciplinarity, and flexibility.
- Improves global credibility and academic mobility.
- Strengthens student-centric governance.
- Concerns
- Risk of over-centralisation affecting federal balance.
- Transition challenges from existing regulatory bodies.
- Capacity gaps in digital and audit mechanisms.
- Possible inequity for smaller or rural institutions.
Way Forward
- Ensure cooperative federalism with State participation.
- Phased implementation with institutional capacity building.
- Independent and robust audit of self- disclosure data.
- Safeguards for diversity, inclusion, and regional equity.
- Periodic review aligned with NEP 2020 outcomes.
TROUBLING REPEAT
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
- On 12 January 2026, PSLV-C62 mission of Indian Space Research Organisation failed due to an anomaly in the third stage (PS3).
- Failure pattern similar to PSLV-C61 (May 2025), which also failed during PS3 operation.
- PSLV is considered ISRO’s most reliable launch vehicle, with over two decades of service.
- Failure Analysis Committee (FAC) report of C61 was not released publicly.
- PSLV is being commercially marketed by NewSpace India Limited.
Key Points
- Technical aspect
- PS3 is a solid rocket motor → pressure drop/roll disturbance indicates structural or nozzle failure.
- Repetition of anomaly suggests systemic Quality Assurance (QA) issue, not random failure.
- Institutional aspect
- Clearing PSLV for flight without public disclosure of FAC findings raised governance concerns.
- Commercial aspect
- Consecutive failures affect global credibility of PSLV.
- Likely rise in insurance premiums, reducing competitiveness in small-satellite launch market.
- Strategic aspect
- C62 carried EOS-N1, reportedly linked to strategic applications (associated with Defence Research and Development Organisation).
- Leadership context
- Current ISRO leadership under V.
- Narayanan marked by high launch cadence and reduced transparency.
- Contrast
- ISRO’s LVM-3 has shown improving reliability (e.g., M6 mission, Dec 2025).
Static Linkages
- Solid propulsion systems require stable chamber pressure for thrust symmetry (NCERT Physics).
- Public institutions funded by taxpayers must ensure accountability and transparency (ARC governance reforms).
- Commercialisation of space activities aims to separate R&D and operations (Department of Space reforms).
- Risk assessment in launch insurance is based on historical failure data (Economic Survey – space economy).
Critical Analysis
- Positives
- Demonstrates ambition to maintain high launch frequency.
- Reliability of LVM-3 indicates technical capability remains strong.
- Negatives / Concerns
- Lack of transparency weakens scientific credibility.
- Repeated PS3 failure points to manufacturing/QA lapses.
- Commercial trust erosion due to higher insurance costs.
- Possible strategic urgency overriding safety caution.
Way Forward
- Publish FAC report of PSLV-C61 with necessary redactions.
- Conduct independent QA and supply-chain audit of PSLV.
- Temporary grounding of PSLV until corrective validation.
- Institutionalise a failure disclosure protocol.
- Balance strategic urgency with mission assurance.
- Diversify commercial launch portfolio beyond PSLV.
WHY ARTICLE 6 EMPOWERS INDIA
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
Context/ Background
- Article 6 of the Paris Agreement operationalised fully at COP29 to strengthen global carbon market
- Article 6.4 mechanism adopted, replacing the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM).
- 89 cooperation arrangements under Article 6.2 across 58 Parties (A6 Implementation Partnership).
- India signed Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) with Japan (Aug 2025), operationalising Article 6.2 for India.
- India identified 13 priority activities for Article 6 cooperation.
Key Provisions of Article 6
- Article 6.2
- Bilateral / plurilateral cooperation.
- Transfer of Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs).
- Requires corresponding adjustments to avoid double counting.
- Article 6.4
- UN-supervised global carbon crediting mechanism.
- Successor to CDM.
- Stricter norms on:
- Additionality
- Environmental integrity
- Transparency
- Sustainable development benefits
Significance for India
- Enables access to advanced low-carbon technologies.
- Channels international climate finance into priority sectors.
- Supports industrial decarbonisation while sustaining economic growth.
- Strengthens bilateral climate diplomacy (e.g., India–Japan JCM).
- Enhances India’s competitiveness in a carbon- constrained global trade regime.
India’s Identified Priority Sectors
- Renewable energy with energy storage Offshore wind and solar thermal power Green hydrogen
- Compressed Bio-Gas (CBG) Fuel-cell-based mobility
- Advanced energy-efficiency technologies Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
- Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) in hard-to-abate sectors
Static Linkages
- UNFCCC → Kyoto Protocol → Paris Agreement transition
- Limitations of CDM (uneven distribution, weak additionality)
- Concept of carbon markets and emissions trading
- Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR)
- Role of technology transfer in sustainable development
- Importance of decarbonising hard-to-abate sectors
Implementation Challenges
- Absence of detailed domestic rules for Article 6 implementation.
- Delay in:
- Letters of Authorisation
- Corresponding adjustment procedures
- Long project approval timelines (AFOLU projects ~1600 days in India).
- High transaction and compliance costs.
- Risk of environmental integrity dilution if governance is weak.
Policy Gaps Identified
- Designated National Authority exists, but scope and procedures unclear.
- No single-window clearance for A6 projects.
- Weak domestic ecosystem for carbon removal technologies.
- Limited institutional capacity for MRV (Measurement, Reporting, Verification).
Way Forward
- Notify comprehensive Article 6 operational guidelines.
- Establish single-window clearance mechanism for carbon projects.
- Set up Cabinet-level steering committee for coordination.
- Develop domestic carbon removals market (biochar, enhanced rock weathering).
- Strengthen MRV systems and digital registries.
- Lead South–South cooperation on carbon markets and climate finance.